The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Layered corrugated electrode macrostructures boost microbial bioelectrocatalysis
Abstract
The future success of microbial bioelectrochemical systems like microbial fuel cells inevitably depends on the increase of their performance at decreasing material costs. One of the key elements and a research priority is the biofuel cell anode. Here we propose layered corrugated carbon (LCC) as an inexpensive but high performance electrode material produced from the carbonization of one of the most abundant packing materials of our society: corrugated cardboard. In the base configuration of one corrugated layer the projected current density of LCC already reaches 70 A m−2. Increasing the number of corrugated layers increases the current density linearly. Thus, 200 A m−2 are achieved at three and 390 A m−2 at six corrugated layers. These current density values, which were confirmed by experiments in two independent laboratories, represent a performance increase of above one order of magnitude compared to the current state of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A review
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282 · Cited by 2,345
Self-citationRecent advances in utilization of biochar
Qian, K., Kumar, A., Zhang, H., Bellmer, D., & Huhnke, R. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.074 · Cited by 915
Bajracharya, S., Sharma, M., Mohanakrishna, G., Dominguez Benneton, X., Strik, D. P. B. T. B., Sarma, P. M., & Pant, D. (2016) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.002 · Cited by 454
Biochar as a sustainable electrode material for electricity production in microbial fuel cells
Huggins, T., Wang, H., Kearns, J., Jenkins, P., & Ren, Z. J. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.058 · Cited by 405
Sonawane, J. M., Yadav, A., Ghosh, P. C., & Adeloju, S. B. (2017) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.014 · Cited by 331
Rousseau, R., Etcheverry, L., Roubaud, E., Basséguy, R., Délia, M.-L., & Bergel, A. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113938 · Cited by 323
High power density microbial fuel cell with flexible 3D graphene–nickel foam as anode
Wang, H., Wang, G., Ling, Y., Qian, F., Song, Y., Lu, X., Chen, S., Tong, Y., & Li, Y. (2013) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c3nr03487a · Cited by 291
Self-citationJourdin, L., Freguia, S., Donose, B. C., Chen, J., Wallace, G. G., Keller, J., & Flexer, V. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c4ta03101f · Cited by 276
Design and fabrication of bioelectrodes for microbial bioelectrochemical systems
Xie, X., Criddle, C., & Cui, Y. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee01862e · Cited by 265
Tang, J., Chen, S., Yuan, Y., Cai, X., & Zhou, S. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.04.074 · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S., He, G., Liu, Q., Harnisch, F., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Hanif, M., Wang, S., Peng, X., Hou, H., & Schröder, U.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 9769
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2107026103
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
