The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomalous and normal diffusion of proteins and lipids in crowded lipid membranes
Abstract
Lateral diffusion plays a crucial role in numerous processes that take place in cell membranes, yet it is quite poorly understood in native membranes characterized by, e.g., domain formation and large concentration of proteins. In this article, we use atomistic and coarse-grained simulations to consider how packing of membranes and crowding with proteins affect the lateral dynamics of lipids and membrane proteins. We find that both packing and protein crowding have a profound effect on lateral diffusion, slowing it down. Anomalous diffusion is observed to be an inherent property in both protein-free and protein-rich membranes, and the time scales of anomalous diffusion and the exponent associated with anomalous diffusion are found to strongly depend on packing and crowding. Crowding with proteins also has a striking effect on the decay rate of dynamical correlations associated with lateral single-particle motion, as the transition from anomalous to normal diffusion is found to take place at macroscopic time scales: while in protein-poor conditions normal diffusion is typically observed in hundreds of nanoseconds, in protein-rich conditions the onset of normal diffusion is tens of microseconds, and in the most crowded systems as large as milliseconds. The computational challenge which results from these time scales is not easy to deal with, not even in coarse-grained simulations. We also briefly discuss the physical limits of protein motion. Our results suggest that protein concentration is anything but constant in the plane of cell membranes. Instead, it is strongly dependent on proteins' preference for aggregation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coarse Grained Model for Semiquantitative Lipid Simulations
Marrink, S. J., de Vries, A. H., & Mark, A. E. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp036508g · Cited by 2,257
Cited by
Metzler, R., Jeon, J.-H., Cherstvy, A. G., & Barkai, E. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp03465a · Cited by 1,765
Self-citationMuller, M. P., Jiang, T., Sun, C., Lihan, M., Pant, S., Mahinthichaichan, P., Trifan, A., & Tajkhorshid, E. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00608 · Cited by 282
Periole, X. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00344 · Cited by 58
A Rigorous Framework for Calculating Protein–Protein Binding Affinities in Membranes
Blazhynska, M., Gumbart, J. C., Chen, H., Tajkhorshid, E., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00941 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Javanainen, M., Hammaren, H., Monticelli, L., Jeon, J.-H., Miettinen, M. S., Martinez-Seara, H., Metzler, R., & Vattulainen, I.
- Venue
- Faraday Discuss.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 161
- Pages
- 397-417
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2090827852
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.