The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introductory Lecture: Basic quantities in model biomembranes
Open accessAbstract
One of the many aspects of membrane biophysics dealt with in this Faraday Discussion regards the material moduli that describe energies at a supramolecular level. This introductory lecture first critically reviews differences in reported numerical values of the bending modulus K(C), which is a central property for the biologically important flexibility of membranes. It is speculated that there may be a reason that the shape analysis method tends to give larger values of K(C) than the micromechanical manipulation method or the more recent X-ray method that agree very well with each other. Another theme of membrane biophysics is the use of simulations to provide exquisite detail of structures and processes. This lecture critically reviews the application of atomic level simulations to the quantitative structure of simple single component lipid bilayers and diagnostics are introduced to evaluate simulations. Another theme of this Faraday Discussion was lateral heterogeneity in biomembranes with many different lipids. Coarse grained simulations and analytical theories promise to synergistically enhance experimental studies when their interaction parameters are tuned to agree with experimental data, such as the slopes of experimental tie lines in ternary phase diagrams. Finally, attention is called to contributions that add relevant biological molecules to bilayers and to contributions that study the exciting shape changes and different non-bilayer structures with different lipids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipowsky, R. (2013) · Faraday Discuss. · doi:10.1039/c2fd20105d · Cited by 270
Cited by
Lipid14: The Amber Lipid Force Field
Dickson, C. J., Madej, B. D., Skjevik, Å. A., Betz, R. M., Teigen, K., Gould, I. R., & Walker, R. C. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct4010307 · Cited by 1,206
Recent developments in the field of bending rigidity measurements on membranes
Dimova, R. (2014) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2014.03.003 · Cited by 503
Beltrán-Heredia, E., Almendro-Vedia, V. G., Monroy, F., & Cao, F. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00312 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagle, J. F.
- Venue
- Faraday Discuss.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 161
- Pages
- 11-29
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2027686683
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.