Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced capacitive deionization performance of graphene/carbon nanotube composites

Zhang, Dengsong, Yan, Tingting, Shi, Liyi, Peng, Zheng, Wen, Xiaoru, Zhang, Jianping·2012·Journal of Materials Chemistry

Abstract

Graphene/carbon nanotube (GR/CNT) composites were prepared by a modified exfoliation approach and used as capacitive deionization (CDI) electrodes. SEM and TEM images demonstrate that the CNTs are successfully inserted into the GR. Nitrogen sorption analysis and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy show that the GR/CNT composites have a larger specific surface area and higher conductivity as compared with GR, which is due to the inserted CNTs inhibiting the aggregation and increasing the conductivity in the vertical direction. Through cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge/discharge evaluation, we can conclude that the prepared composites have higher specific capacitance values and better stability, suggesting that the GR/CNT composite electrodes have a higher electrosorption capacity. Power and energy density analysis shows that the GR/CNT composite electrodes have higher power density and energy density and the energy density decay is relatively slow in a wide range of power as compared with GR, which indicates that the composite electrodes exhibit low energy consumption for capacitive deionization. The desalination capacity was evaluated by a batch mode electrosorptive experiment in a NaCl aqueous solution. As compared with GR and commercial activated carbon, the GR/CNT composite electrodes exhibit excellent desalination behavior, which is attributed to the improved electric conductivity and higher accessible surface area, which are quite beneficial for the electrosorption of ions onto the electrodes. The GR/CNT composites are confirmed to be promising materials for CDI electrodes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2jm31393f

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, D., Yan, T., Shi, L., Peng, Z., Wen, X., & Zhang, J.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry
Published
2012
Volume
22
Issue
29
Pages
14696
ISSN
  • 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5501
OpenAlex
W2009131627
Cited by
355
References
1
FWCI
19.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced capacitive deionization performance of graphene/carbon nanotube composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2jm31393f
The paper
Zhang, D., Yan, T., Shi, L., Peng, Z., Wen, X., & Zhang, J. (2012). Enhanced capacitive deionization performance of graphene/carbon nanotube composites. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm31393f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.