The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced capacitive deionization performance of graphene/carbon nanotube composites
Abstract
Graphene/carbon nanotube (GR/CNT) composites were prepared by a modified exfoliation approach and used as capacitive deionization (CDI) electrodes. SEM and TEM images demonstrate that the CNTs are successfully inserted into the GR. Nitrogen sorption analysis and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy show that the GR/CNT composites have a larger specific surface area and higher conductivity as compared with GR, which is due to the inserted CNTs inhibiting the aggregation and increasing the conductivity in the vertical direction. Through cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge/discharge evaluation, we can conclude that the prepared composites have higher specific capacitance values and better stability, suggesting that the GR/CNT composite electrodes have a higher electrosorption capacity. Power and energy density analysis shows that the GR/CNT composite electrodes have higher power density and energy density and the energy density decay is relatively slow in a wide range of power as compared with GR, which indicates that the composite electrodes exhibit low energy consumption for capacitive deionization. The desalination capacity was evaluated by a batch mode electrosorptive experiment in a NaCl aqueous solution. As compared with GR and commercial activated carbon, the GR/CNT composite electrodes exhibit excellent desalination behavior, which is attributed to the improved electric conductivity and higher accessible surface area, which are quite beneficial for the electrosorption of ions onto the electrodes. The GR/CNT composites are confirmed to be promising materials for CDI electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphene Oxide-Assisted Dispersion of Pristine Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Media
Zhang, C., Ren, L., Wang, X., & Liu, T. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp103745g · Cited by 348
Cited by
Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials
Perreault, F., Fonseca de Faria, A., & Elimelech, M. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00021a · Cited by 1,528
Youn, D. H., Han, S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, J. Y., Park, H., Choi, S. H., & Lee, J. S. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn5012144 · Cited by 559
Energy Efficiency of Capacitive Deionization
Wang, L., Dykstra, J. E., & Lin, S. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04858 · Cited by 292
Yeh, C.-L., Hsi, H.-C., Li, K.-C., & Hou, C.-H. (2015) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.035 · Cited by 275
Versatile zero‐ to three‐dimensional carbon for electrochemical energy storage
Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Cao, D., Sun, X., & Zhu, H. (2021) · Carbon Energy · doi:10.1002/cey2.137 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, D., Yan, T., Shi, L., Peng, Z., Wen, X., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 14696
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2009131627
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced capacitive deionization performance of graphene/carbon nanotube composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2jm31393f
- The paper
- Zhang, D., Yan, T., Shi, L., Peng, Z., Wen, X., & Zhang, J. (2012). Enhanced capacitive deionization performance of graphene/carbon nanotube composites. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm31393f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.