The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tunnelling control of chemical reactions – the organic chemist's perspective
Open accessAbstract
Even though quantum mechanical tunnelling has been appearing recurrently mostly in theoretical studies that emphasize its decisive role for many chemical reactions, it still appears suspicious to most organic chemists. Recent experiments in combination with powerful computational approaches, however, have demonstrated that tunnelling must be included to fully understand chemical reactivity. Here we provide an overview of the importance of tunnelling in organic chemical reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bildung einer zuckerartigen Substanz durch Synthese
Butlerow, A. (1861) · Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie · doi:10.1002/jlac.18611200308 · Cited by 266
Cited by
A computational chemist's guide to accurate thermochemistry for organic molecules
Karton, A. (2016) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1249 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Ley, D., Gerbig, D., & Schreiner, P. R.
- Venue
- Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3781
- ISSN
- 1477-0520 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0539
- OpenAlex
- W1973114740
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tunnelling control of chemical reactions – the organic chemist's perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ob07170c
- The paper
- Ley, D., Gerbig, D., & Schreiner, P. R. (2012). Tunnelling control of chemical reactions – the organic chemist's perspective. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ob07170c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
