Cited by 43Microfluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Separation of chiral colloidal particles in a helical flow field

Aristov, Maria, Eichhorn, Ralf, Bechinger, Clemens·2013·Soft Matter

Abstract

Stereoisomeric molecules with opposite chirality, so-called enantiomers, often vary regarding their sensory, pharmacological and toxicological properties. Such enantiomer specific effects play a central role in the development, testing and evaluation of drugs, pesticides and food related products. Accordingly, efficient techniques for separation of chiral mixtures into enantiopure compounds are of enormous practical relevance. Most current enantiomer separation methods are based on enantioselective interactions with an auxiliary substance which has to be developed and optimized for different chiral molecules in an elaborate and costly process. Here, we experimentally demonstrate the separation of micron-sized chiral particles in a helical fluid flow which is created inside a microfluidic device patterned with slanted grooves. We observe that the retention time of particles in a helical flow field strongly depends on their chirality which leads to an effective chiral separation within the channel. Our experimental results are confirmed by numerical calculations which demonstrate how the coupling of rotational and translational degrees of freedom leads to differences in the trajectories of particles with opposite chirality. Since our separation mechanism does not rely on material specific interactions, this offers considerable advantages over existing methods. We expect that our approach can be also applied at nanometre length scales by using channels with smaller diameters and with an optimized geometry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2sm27441h

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluid flows can discriminate not only large chiral objects, but also helical bacteria, colloidal particles, and supramolecular aggregates.

    “A few experimental reports indicate that fluid flows can discriminate not only large chiral objects, 140-142 but also helical bacteria, 143 colloidal particles, 144 and supramolecular aggregates.145,146”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aristov, M., Eichhorn, R., & Bechinger, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Stuttgart (DE)
  • Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics (SE)
Corresponding author
Bechinger, Clemens
Venue
Soft Matter
Published
2013
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
2525
ISSN
  • 1744-683X (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6848
OpenAlex
W1979864973
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Soft Matter (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
enantiomer separation, helical flow, microfluidics, particle residence time, translational-rotational coupling, particle trajectories, enantioselective separation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review