Separation of chiral colloidal particles in a helical flow field
Abstract
Stereoisomeric molecules with opposite chirality, so-called enantiomers, often vary regarding their sensory, pharmacological and toxicological properties. Such enantiomer specific effects play a central role in the development, testing and evaluation of drugs, pesticides and food related products. Accordingly, efficient techniques for separation of chiral mixtures into enantiopure compounds are of enormous practical relevance. Most current enantiomer separation methods are based on enantioselective interactions with an auxiliary substance which has to be developed and optimized for different chiral molecules in an elaborate and costly process. Here, we experimentally demonstrate the separation of micron-sized chiral particles in a helical fluid flow which is created inside a microfluidic device patterned with slanted grooves. We observe that the retention time of particles in a helical flow field strongly depends on their chirality which leads to an effective chiral separation within the channel. Our experimental results are confirmed by numerical calculations which demonstrate how the coupling of rotational and translational degrees of freedom leads to differences in the trajectories of particles with opposite chirality. Since our separation mechanism does not rely on material specific interactions, this offers considerable advantages over existing methods. We expect that our approach can be also applied at nanometre length scales by using channels with smaller diameters and with an optimized geometry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluid flows can discriminate not only large chiral objects, but also helical bacteria, colloidal particles, and supramolecular aggregates.
“A few experimental reports indicate that fluid flows can discriminate not only large chiral objects, 140-142 but also helical bacteria, 143 colloidal particles, 144 and supramolecular aggregates.145,146”
From Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality (2022) · cites this paper as [144]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality
Sallembien, Q., Bouteiller, L., Crassous, J., & Raynal, M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs01179k · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Vortex flows impart chirality-specific lift forces
Hermans, T. M., Bishop, K. J. M., Stewart, P. S., Davis, S. H., & Grzybowski, B. A. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6640 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aristov, M., Eichhorn, R., & Bechinger, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Bechinger, Clemens
- Venue
- Soft Matter
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2525
- ISSN
- 1744-683X (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6848
- OpenAlex
- W1979864973
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soft Matter (publishedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
- Keywords
- enantiomer separation, helical flow, microfluidics, particle residence time, translational-rotational coupling, particle trajectories, enantioselective separation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review