Cited by 115Polymer crystallization and propertiesMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly

Homogeneous crystallization and local dynamics of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) confined to nanoporous alumina

Suzuki, Yasuhito, Duran, Hatice, Steinhart, Martin, Butt, Hans-Jürgen, Floudas, George·2013·Soft Matter

Abstract

The crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) confined in self-ordered nanoporous alumina (AAO) containing aligned and straight cylindrical nanopores was studied as a function of molecular weight, pore size and cooling/heating rate by differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray scattering. Bulk PEO crystallizes via heterogeneous nucleation at defects and impurities whereas PEO confined to AAO crystallizes mainly via homogeneous nucleation. Molecular weight and cooling rate have a pronounced effect on the nucleation process. Dielectric spectroscopy revealed that confining PEO to AAO results in broadening of the distribution of relaxation times associated with the segmental α relaxation process and the secondary β process. Dielectric loss peaks become broader with decreasing pore diameter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2sm27618f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suzuki et al. observed cooling-rate-dependent fractionated crystallization for PEO inside 200 nm pores.

    “Suzuki et al. [272] observed a cooling rate dependent fractionated crystallization behavior for PEO inside 200 nm pores.”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [272]

  • Fast cooling suppressed the exothermic peaks at high temperatures for PEO in AAO.

    “Fast cooling suppressed the exothermic peaks at high temperatures.”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [272]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 115

Authors
Suzuki, Y., Duran, H., Steinhart, M., Butt, H.-J., & Floudas, G.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Osnabrück University (DE)
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
Corresponding author
Floudas, George
Venue
Soft Matter
Published
2013
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
2621
ISSN
  • 1744-683X (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6848
OpenAlex
W2073433136
Cited by
115
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Soft Matter (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Dynamics and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
Keywords
poly(ethylene oxide), nanoporous alumina, homogeneous nucleation, confined crystallization, cylindrical nanopores, pore size effects, molecular weight effects, cooling rate, beta relaxation, local dynamics, dielectric relaxation, polymer crystallization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review