The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can all nitrogen-doped defects improve the performance of graphene anode materials for lithium-ion batteries?
Abstract
The electronic and adsorption properties of graphene can be changed significantly through substitutional doping with nitrogen and nitrogen decoration of vacancies. Here ab initio density functional theory with a dispersion correction was used to investigate the stability, magnetic and adsorption properties of nine defects in graphene, including both nitrogen substitutional doping and nitrogen decoration of vacancies. The results indicate that only pyridinic N2V2 defect in graphene shows a ferromagnetic spin structure with high magnetic moment and magnetic stabilization energy. Not all nitrogen-doped defects can improve the capacity of the lithium-ion batteries. The adsorption energies of a lithium atom on nitrogen-substituted graphenes are more positive, indicating that they are meta-stable and no better than the pristine graphene as anode materials of lithium-ion batteries. Nitrogen-decorated single and double vacancy defects, especially for the pyridinic N2V2 defect in graphene, can greatly improve the reversible capacity of the battery in comparison with the pristine graphene. The theoretical prediction of the reversible capacity of the battery is 1039 mA h g(-1) for the nitrogen-doped graphene material synthesized by Wu et al., which is in good agreement with the experimental data (1043 mA h g(-1)). The theoretical computations suggest that nitrogen-decorated single and double vacancy defects in graphene are the promising candidate for anode materials of lithium-ion batteries. Each nitrogen atom in the decoration can improve the reversible capacity of the battery by 63.3-124.5 mA h g(-1) in a 4 × 4 supercell of graphene. The present work provides crucial information for the development of N-doped graphene-based anode materials of lithium-ion batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphene: Status and Prospects
Geim, A. K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158877 · Cited by 13,942
Berger, C., Song, Z., Li, T., Li, X., Ogbazghi, A. Y., Feng, R., Dai, Z., Marchenkov, A. N., Conrad, E. H., First, P. N., et al. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp040650f · Cited by 3,548
Cited by
Heteroatom-doped graphene materials: syntheses, properties and applications
Wang, X., Sun, G., Routh, P., Kim, D.-H., Huang, W., & Chen, P. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00141a · Cited by 1,891
Carbon nitrides: synthesis and characterization of a new class of functional materials
Miller, T. S., Jorge, A. B., Suter, T. M., Sella, A., Corà, F., & McMillan, P. F. (2017) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c7cp02711g · Cited by 465
Design Considerations for Unconventional Electrochemical Energy Storage Architectures
Vlad, A., Singh, N., Galande, C., & Ajayan, P. M. (2015) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201402115 · Cited by 346
Shrivastav, V., Sundriyal, S., Goel, P., Kaur, H., Tuteja, S. K., Vikrant, K., Kim, K.-H., Tiwari, U. K., & Deep, A. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.05.006 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Y.-X.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 16819
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2117666989
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can all nitrogen-doped defects improve the performance of graphene anode materials for lithium-ion batteries? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3cp51689j
- The paper
- Yu, Y.-X. (2013). Can all nitrogen-doped defects improve the performance of graphene anode materials for lithium-ion batteries? Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp51689j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.