Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Array sensing using optical methods for detection of chemical and biological hazards

Diehl, Katharine L., Anslyn, Eric V.·2013·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

By mimicking the mammalian senses of taste and smell, artificial arrays of cross-reactive receptors have found use in a variety of sensing applications. Pattern recognition algorithms allow these arrays to be used for discriminating analytes and even for predicting the identity of unknown analytes. Furthermore, in selecting a signaling method for these assays, the choice of optical detection is particularly desirable due to its high sensitivity and the associated convenient instrumentation. This tutorial review provides a brief introduction to array sensing using optical detection and chemometrics. While differential sensing approaches have been used for a number of applications, this review focuses on progress towards the detection of chemical and biological hazards.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3cs60136f

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Diehl, K. L., & Anslyn, E. V.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2013
Volume
42
Issue
22
Pages
8596
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2008721938
Cited by
332
References
16
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.