The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative study of graphene oxide, activated carbon and carbon nanotubes as adsorbents for copper decontamination
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study of Cu(II) decontamination by three different carbonaceous materials, i.e., graphene oxide, multiwalled carbon nanotubes, and activated carbon. The three carbonaceous materials were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, N2-BET surface area analysis, and potentiometric acid-base titrations in detail. Also, Cu(II) adsorption on the three types of carbonaceous materials as a function of pH and Cu(II) ion concentration were investigated. The constant capacitance model was used to determine the appropriate surface reactions of Cu(II) adsorption on carbonaceous materials with the aid of FITEQL 4.0 software. In addition, how the surface area and the total concentration of acidic functional groups influencing the adsorption capacities of the three carbonaceous materials for Cu(II) removal were elucidated. The results have an important role in predicting the adsorption capacity of surface modified carbonaceous materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum
Langmuir, I. (1918) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja02242a004 · Cited by 23,242
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Cited by
Burakov, A. E., Galunin, E. V., Burakova, I. V., Kucherova, A. E., Agarwal, S., Tkachev, A. G., & Gupta, V. K. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.034 · Cited by 1,612
Zou, Y., Wang, X., Khan, A., Wang, P., Liu, Y., Alsaedi, A., Hayat, T., & Wang, X. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b01897 · Cited by 1,369
Self-citationIhsanullah, Abbas, A., Al-Amer, A. M., Laoui, T., Al-Marri, M. J., Nasser, M. S., Khraisheh, M., & Atieh, M. A. (2016) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.039 · Cited by 1,259
Polymer-based nanocomposites for heavy metal ions removal from aqueous solution: a review
Zhao, G., Huang, X., Tang, Z., Huang, Q., Niu, F., & Wang, X. (2018) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8py00484f · Cited by 531
Self-citationSherlala, A. I. A., Raman, A. A. A., Bello, M. M., & Asghar, A. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.093 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, X., Li, J., Tan, X., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Dalton Transactions
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5266
- ISSN
- 1477-9226 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9234
- OpenAlex
- W2008618029
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative study of graphene oxide, activated carbon and carbon nanotubes as adsorbents for copper decontamination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3dt32969k
- The paper
- Ren, X., Li, J., Tan, X., & Wang, X. (2013). Comparative study of graphene oxide, activated carbon and carbon nanotubes as adsorbents for copper decontamination. Dalton Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3dt32969k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
