The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From dead leaves to high energy density supercapacitors
Abstract
Functional microporous conducting carbon with a high surface area of about 1230 m2 g−1 is synthesized by single-step pyrolysis of dead plant leaves (dry waste, ground powder) without any activation and studied for supercapacitor application. We suggest that the activation is provided by the natural constituents in the leaves composed of soft organics and metals. Although the detailed study performed and reported here is on dead Neem leaves (Azadirachta indica), the process is clearly generic and applicable to most forms of dead leaves. Indeed we have examined the case of dead Ashoka leaves as well. The comparison between the Neem and Ashoka leaves brings out the importance of the constitution and composition of the bio-source in the nature of carbon formed and its properties. We also discuss and compare the cases of pyrolysis of green leaves as well as un-ground dead leaves with that of ground dead leaf powder studied in full detail. The concurrent high conductivity and microporosity realized in our carbonaceous materials are key to the high energy supercapacitor application. Indeed, our synthesized functional carbon exhibits a very high specific capacitance of 400 F g−1 and an energy density of 55 W h kg−1 at a current density of 0.5 A g−1 in aqueous 1 M H2SO4. The areal capacitance value of the carbon derived from dead (Neem) plant leaves (CDDPL) is also significantly high (32 μF cm−2). In an organic electrolyte the material shows a specific capacitance of 88 F g−1 at a current density of 2 A g−1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CO2 Capture in Different Carbon Materials
Jiménez, V., Ramírez-Lucas, A., Díaz, J. A., Sánchez, P., & Romero, A. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2046553 · Cited by 158
Cited by
Hou, J., Cao, C., Idrees, F., & Ma, X. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn506394r · Cited by 1,529
Supercapacitors Performance Evaluation
Zhang, S., & Pan, N. (2015) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201401401 · Cited by 1,529
Hydrothermal conversion of biomass waste to activated carbon with high porosity: A review
Jain, A., Balasubramanian, R., & Srinivasan, M. P. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.014 · Cited by 1,199
Peanut shell hybrid sodium ion capacitor with extreme energy–power rivals lithium ion capacitors
Ding, J., Wang, H., Li, Z., Cui, K., Karpuzov, D., Tan, X., Kohandehghan, A., & Mitlin, D. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee02986k · Cited by 818
Wood-based nanotechnologies toward sustainability
Jiang, F., Li, T., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Gong, A., Dai, J., Hitz, E., Luo, W., & Hu, L. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201703453 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- Biswal, M., Banerjee, A., Deo, M., & Ogale, S.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1249
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2154191311
- Cited by
- 903
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.