The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Postsynthetic tuning of hydrophilicity in pyrazolate MOFs to modulate water adsorption properties
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted interest as adsorbents in water-based adsorption heat pumps owing to their potential for increased water loading capacities and structural and functional tunability versus traditionally used materials such as zeolites and silica. Although pyrazolate-based MOFs exhibit exceptional hydrolytic stability, the water adsorption characteristics of this class of frameworks have remained unexplored in this context. In this report, we describe the modular synthesis of novel dipyrazole ligands containing naphthalenediimide cores functionalized with –H (H2NDI–H), –NHEt (H2NDI–NHEt), or –SEt (H2NDI–SEt) groups. Reaction of these ligands with Zn(NO3)2 afforded an isostructural series of MOFs, Zn(NDI–X), featuring infinite chains of tetrahedral Zn2+ ions bridged by pyrazolate groups and ∼16 Å-wide channels with functionalized naphthalenediimide linkers lining the channel surface. The Type V water adsorption isotherms measured for these materials show water uptake in the 40–50% relative humidity range, suggesting hydrophobic channel interiors. Postsynthetic oxidation of Zn(NDI–SEt) with dimethyldioxirane was used to generate ethyl sulfoxide and ethyl sulfone groups, thereby rendering the channels more hydrophilic, as evidenced by shifts in water uptake to the 30–40% relative humidity range. Such tunability in water adsorption characteristics may find utility in the design of new adsorbents for adsorption-based heat transfer processes. An original MATLAB script, MOF-FIT, which allows for visual modeling of breathing and other structural deformations in MOFs is also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Burtch, N. C., Jasuja, H., & Walton, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5002589 · Cited by 2,730
Water adsorption in MOFs: fundamentals and applications
Canivet, J., Fateeva, A., Guo, Y., Coasne, B., & Farrusseng, D. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00078a · Cited by 1,444
Structures of Metal–Organic Frameworks with Rod Secondary Building Units
Schoedel, A., Li, M., Li, D., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00346 · Cited by 909
Grand Challenges and Future Opportunities for Metal–Organic Frameworks
Hendon, C. H., Rieth, A. J., Korzyński, M. D., & Dincă, M. (2017) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00197 · Cited by 434
Self-citationKinetic stability of metal–organic frameworks for corrosive and coordinating gas capture
Rieth, A. J., Wright, A. M., & Dincă, M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0140-1 · Cited by 402
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wade, C. R., Corrales-Sanchez, T., Narayan, T. C., & Dincă, M.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2172
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2148173626
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postsynthetic tuning of hydrophilicity in pyrazolate MOFs to modulate water adsorption properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ee40876k
- The paper
- Wade, C. R., Corrales-Sanchez, T., Narayan, T. C., & Dincă, M. (2013). Postsynthetic tuning of hydrophilicity in pyrazolate MOFs to modulate water adsorption properties. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40876k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.