The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A carbon quantum dot decorated RuO2 network: outstanding supercapacitances under ultrafast charge and discharge
Abstract
Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) due to their unique properties have recently attracted extensive attention from researchers in many fields. In the present work, a new application in the form of a CQD-based hybrid as an excellent electrode material for supercapacitors is reported for the first time. The CQDs are fabricated by a facile chemical oxidation method following which they are thermally reduced, and further decorated with RuO2 to obtain the composites. The hybrid exhibits a specific capacitance of 460 F g−1 at an ultrahigh current density of 50 A g−1 (41.9 wt% Ru loading), and excellent rate capability (88.6, 84.2, and 77.4% of capacity retention rate at 10, 20, and 50 A g−1 compared with 1 A g−1, respectively). Surprisingly, the hybrid shows exceptional cycling stability with 96.9% capacity retention over 5000 cycles at 5 A g−1. Such remarkable electrochemical performances can be primarily ascribed to the significantly enhanced utilization of RuO2 achieved by the efficient dispersion of tiny reduced CQDs and the formation of a CQD-based hybrid network structure that can facilitate the fast charge transport and ionic motion during the charge–discharge process. Additionally, the contact resistance at the interface between active materials and current collectors is concluded to be a key factor in determining the performance of the hybrid. These results above demonstrate the great potential of CQD-based hybrid materials in the development of high-performance electrode materials for supercapacitors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanocrystal Growth on Graphene with Various Degrees of Oxidation
Wang, H., Robinson, J. T., Diankov, G., & Dai, H. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja100329d · Cited by 530
Cited by
Carbon quantum dots: synthesis, properties and applications
Wang, Y., & Hu, A. (2014) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c4tc00988f · Cited by 2,597
Efficient storage mechanisms for building better supercapacitors
Salanne, M., Rotenberg, B., Naoi, K., Kaneko, K., Taberna, P.-L., Grey, C. P., Dunn, B., & Simon, P. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.70 · Cited by 2,181
Kumar, S., Saeed, G., Zhu, L., Hui, K. N., Kim, N. H., & Lee, J. H. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126352 · Cited by 1,152
Di, J., Xia, J., Ge, Y., Li, H., Ji, H., Xu, H., Zhang, Q., Li, H., & Li, M. (2015) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.057 · Cited by 579
Carbon quantum dots for advanced electrocatalysis
Tian, L., Li, Z., Wang, P., Zhai, X., Wang, X., & Li, T. (2021) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2020.06.057 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Ji, X., Pan, C., Sun, Q., Song, W., Fang, L., Chen, Q., & Banks, C. E.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3665
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2059705853
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.