The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A perfluorinated covalent triazine-based framework for highly selective and water–tolerant CO2 capture
Abstract
We designed and synthesized a perfluorinated covalent triazine-based framework (FCTF-1) for selective CO2 capture. The incorporation of fluorine (F) groups played multiple roles in improving the framework's CO2 adsorption and separation capabilities. Thermodynamically, the strongly polar C–F bonds promoted CO2 adsorption via electrostatic interactions, especially at low pressures. FCTF-1's CO2 uptake was 1.76 mmol g−1 at 273 K and 0.1 bar through equilibrium adsorption, exceeding the CO2 adsorption capacity of any reported porous organic polymers to date. In addition, incorporating F groups produced a significant amount of ultra-micropores (<0.5 nm), which offered not only high gas adsorption potential but also kinetic selectivity for CO2–N2 separation. In mixed-gas breakthrough experiments, FCTF-1 exhibited an exceptional CO2–N2 selectivity of 77 under kinetic flow conditions, much higher than the selectivity (31) predicted from single-gas equilibrium adsorption data. Moreover, FCTF-1 proved to be tolerant to water and its CO2 capture performance remained excellent when there was moisture in the gas mixture, due to the hydrophobic nature of the C–F bonds. In addition, the moderate adsorbate–adsorbent interaction allowed it to be fully regenerated by pressure swing adsorption processes. These attributes make FCTF-1 a promising sorbent for CO2 capture from flue gas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture
Sevilla, M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00784f · Cited by 1,088
Deng, H., Yi, H., Tang, X., Yu, Q., Ning, P., & Yang, L. (2012) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.026 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Liu, R., Tan, K. T., Gong, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Xie, S., He, T., Lu, Z., Yang, H., & Jiang, D. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00620c · Cited by 1,083
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for environmental applications
Wang, J., & Zhuang, S. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213046 · Cited by 677
Porous Organic Polymers for Post‐Combustion Carbon Capture
Zou, L., Sun, Y., Che, S., Yang, X., Wang, X., Bosch, M., Wang, Q., Li, H., Smith, M., Yuan, S., et al. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201700229 · Cited by 432
Porous organic polymers for CO2capture, separation and conversion
Song, K. S., Fritz, P. W., & Coskun, A. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00727d · Cited by 409
Trends in Solid Adsorbent Materials Development for CO 2 Capture
Pardakhti, M., Jafari, T., Tobin, Z., Dutta, B., Moharreri, E., Shemshaki, N. S., Suib, S., & Srivastava, R. (2019) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b08487 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Yao, K. X., Teng, B., Zhang, T., & Han, Y.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3684
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2085511957
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.