Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Performance-improved Li–O2 battery with Ru nanoparticles supported on binder-free multi-walled carbon nanotube paper as cathode

Li, Fujun, Chen, Yong, Tang, Dai-Ming, Jian, Zelang, Liu, Chang, Golberg, Dmitri, Yamada, Atsuo, Zhou, Haoshen·2014·Energy Environ. Sci.

Abstract

Ru nanoparticles supported on a multi-walled carbon nanotube paper as a cathode in a Li–O 2 battery can significantly reduce the charge overpotentials, and present a large discharge–charge capacity and stable cycles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3ee44043e

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Li, F., Chen, Y., Tang, D.-M., Jian, Z., Liu, C., Golberg, D., Yamada, A., & Zhou, H.
Venue
Energy Environ. Sci.
Published
2014
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
1648-1652
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2149868851
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance-improved Li–O2 battery with Ru nanoparticles supported on binder-free multi-walled carbon nanotube paper as cathode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ee44043e
The paper
Li, F., Chen, Y., Tang, D.-M., Jian, Z., Liu, C., Golberg, D., Yamada, A., & Zhou, H. (2014). Performance-improved Li–O2 battery with Ru nanoparticles supported on binder-free multi-walled carbon nanotube paper as cathode. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee44043e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.