Selenium isotope analysis of organic-rich shales: advances in sample preparation and isobaric interference correction
Abstract
Selenium has a complex biogeochemical cycle with many similarities to that of sulfur. Fractionations of selenium isotopes induced in bacterial respiration reactions have been recognized as potential recorders of environmental oxidation states, opening up the possibility of further constraining bioproductivity and the redox evolution of the Earth's atmosphere and ocean over time. However, analyses of selenium isotopes are complicated by interferences with organic compounds as well as a number of isobaric interferences. Application of existing sample preparation protocols to geological samples replete with organic carbon can result in incomplete extraction yields and incomplete removal of isobarically interfering germanium and arsenic. We present measurements of three different organic-rich shales of varying ages prepared with eight different sample preparation protocols and identify a method with which high selenium yields are obtained for all three samples while the concentration of germanium is greatly reduced. We further investigate the quantitative importance of isobaric interferences and present new post-analytical data correction protocols. If selenium concentrations in standards and samples are matched to within 5%, the ratios of five isotopes of selenium (74Se, 76Se, 77Se, 78Se and 82Se) can be measured with precisions better than 0.2‰ for δ76/78Se, δ77/78Se and δ82/78Se and 0.5‰ for δ74/78Se, allowing analytical accuracy to be monitored with three-isotope diagrams and thus enabling the detection of any mass-independent isotopic fractionation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the last decade, analysis of selenium isotopic fractionations was applied to black shale-hosted selenium-rich deposits in China, USGS shale standards, black shale samples from Australia and Canada, and sediments and soils.
“In the last decade, analysis of Se isotopic fractionations to study geochemical processes and sources were applied to black shale-hosted Se-rich deposits in China [112,113,114], USGS shale standards [115], black shale samples from Australia and Canada [116] and sediments and soils [117,118].”
From Selenium Cycling Across Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Interfaces: A Critical Review (2015) · cites this paper as [116]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Stüeken, E. E., Foriel, J., Nelson, B. K., Buick, R., & Catling, D. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stüeken, E. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1734
- ISSN
- 0267-9477 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5544
- OpenAlex
- W2103838743
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- NASA Astrobiology Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Keywords
- selenium isotopes, organic-rich shale, sample preparation, isobaric interference correction, arsenic interference, selenium extraction, selenium biogeochemistry, redox evolution, mass-independent fractionation, selenium-82
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review