Magnetic particle imaging: advancements and perspectives for real-time in vivo monitoring and image-guided therapy
Abstract
Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is an emerging biomedical imaging technology that allows the direct quantitative mapping of the spatial distribution of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. MPI's increased sensitivity and short image acquisition times foster the creation of tomographic images with high temporal and spatial resolution. The contrast and sensitivity of MPI is envisioned to transcend those of other medical imaging modalities presently used, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray scans, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). In this review, we present an overview of the recent advances in the rapidly developing field of MPI. We begin with a basic introduction of the fundamentals of MPI, followed by some highlights over the past decade of the evolution of strategies and approaches used to improve this new imaging technique. We also examine the optimization of iron oxide nanoparticle tracers used for imaging, underscoring the importance of size homogeneity and surface engineering. Finally, we present some future research directions for MPI, emphasizing the novel and exciting opportunities that it offers as an important tool for real-time in vivo monitoring. All these opportunities and capabilities that MPI presents are now seen as potential breakthrough innovations in timely disease diagnosis, implant monitoring, and image-guided therapeutics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) provides 3D information on iron oxide nanoparticle distribution and has advantages over MRI including absence of background signals, high temporal/spatial resolution, high sensitivity, and fast acquisition.
“Magnetic particle imaging provides 3D information on the distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles, and has several advantages over MRI. These include the absence of potentially disturbing background signals, high temporal and spatial resolution with good quantification features, high sensitivity and fast imaging acquisition [193].”
From Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications (2019) · cites this paper as [193]
SPION-labeling in combination with MRI (and recently also MPI) has been the method of choice for cell tracking.
“SPION-labeling in combination with MRI (and recently also MPI) has been the method of choice for cell tracking [193, 255].”
From Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications (2019) · cites this paper as [193]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications
Dadfar, S. M., Roemhild, K., Drude, N. I., von Stillfried, S., Knüchel, R., Kiessling, F., & Lammers, T. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.005 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pablico-Lansigan, M. H., Situ, S. F., & Samia, A. C. S.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Samia, Anna Cristina S.
- Venue
- Nanoscale
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4040
- ISSN
- 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-3372
- OpenAlex
- W2147175942
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nanoscale (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Case Western Reserve University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
- Keywords
- magnetic particle imaging, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, surface engineering, in vivo monitoring, image-guided therapy, implant monitoring, tomography, contrast enhancement
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Portraits as Topic, Tomography, Magnetite Nanoparticles, Magnetic Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review