The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective adsorption of ethylene over ethane and propylene over propane in the metal–organic frameworks M2(dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn)
Open accessAbstract
A significant reduction in the energy costs associated with the cryogenic separation of ethylene–ethane and propylene–propane mixtures could potentially be realized through the use of selective solid adsorbents that operate at higher temperatures. The metal–organic frameworks M2(dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn; dobdc4− = 2,5-dioxido-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) are of particular interest for this application, owing to their high density of coordinatively unsaturated M2+ cation sites that can selectively interact with unsaturated hydrocarbons. Here, we present gas adsorption data for ethylene, ethane, propylene, and propane at 45, 60, and 80 °C for the entire series. The means of sample preparation and activation is found to be important for achieving high separation selectivities and capacities. While all of the compounds investigated show good performance characteristics, Fe2(dobdc) and Mn2(dobdc) exhibit the highest selectivities for the separation of ethylene–ethane and propylene–propane mixtures, respectively. Crystal structures determined from neutron powder diffraction data elucidate the binding of ethane, ethylene, and propylene in Mn2(dobdc) and Co2(dobdc).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
Olefin/paraffin separation technology: a review
Eldridge, R. B. (1993) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie00022a002 · Cited by 746
He, Y., Krishna, R., & Chen, B. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22858k · Cited by 674
Sumida, K., Horike, S., Kaye, S. S., Herm, Z. R., Queen, W. L., Brown, C. M., Grandjean, F., Long, G. J., Dailly, A., & Long, J. R. (2010) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c0sc00179a · Cited by 347
Self-citationOlefin/paraffin separations by adsorption: π‐Complexation vs. kinetic separation
Rege, S. U., Padin, J., & Yang, R. T. (1998) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690440405 · Cited by 225
Large-Scale Computational Screening of Zeolites for Ethane/Ethene Separation
Kim, J., Lin, L.-C., Martin, R. L., Swisher, J. A., Haranczyk, M., & Smit, B. (2012) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la302230z · Cited by 104
Cited by
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126
Wang, Y., Peh, S. B., & Zhao, D. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201900058 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Geier, S. J., Mason, J. A., Bloch, E. D., Queen, W. L., Hudson, M. R., Brown, C. M., & Long, J. R.
- Venue
- Chemical Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2054
- ISSN
- 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-6539
- OpenAlex
- W2113481168
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective adsorption of ethylene over ethane and propylene over propane in the metal–organic frameworks M2(dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3sc00032j
- The paper
- Geier, S. J., Mason, J. A., Bloch, E. D., Queen, W. L., Hudson, M. R., Brown, C. M., & Long, J. R. (2013). Selective adsorption of ethylene over ethane and propylene over propane in the metal–organic frameworks M2(dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn). Chemical Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sc00032j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.