The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic modulation and enhancement of CO2 : N2 selectivity and water stability in an isoreticular series of bio-MOF-11 analogues
Open accessAbstract
An isoreticular series of cobalt-adeninate bio-MOFs (bio-MOFs-11–14) is reported. The pores of bio-MOFs-11–14 are decorated with acetate, propionate, butyrate, and valerate, respectively. The nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) adsorption properties of these materials are studied and compared. The isosteric heats of adsorption for CO2 are calculated, and the CO2 : N2 selectivities for each material are determined. As the lengths of the aliphatic chains decorating the pores in bio-MOFs-11–14 increase, the BET surface areas decrease from 1148 m2 g−1 to 17 m2 g−1 while the CO2 : N2 selectivities predicted from ideal adsorbed solution theory at 1 bar and 273 K for a 10 : 90 CO2 : N2 mixture range from 73 : 1 for bio-MOF-11 to 123 : 1 for bio-MOF-12 and finally to 107 : 1 for bio-MOF-13. At 298 K, the selectivities are 43 : 1 for bio-MOF-11, 52 : 1 for bio-MOF-12, and 40 : 1 for bio-MOF-13. Additionally, it is shown that bio-MOF-14 exhibits a unique molecular sieving property that allows it to adsorb CO2 but not N2 at 273 and 298 K. Finally, the water stability of bio-MOFs-11–14 increases with increasing aliphatic chain length. Bio-MOF-14 exhibits no loss of crystallinity or porosity after soaking in water for one month.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Burtch, N. C., Jasuja, H., & Walton, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5002589 · Cited by 2,730
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Metal–organic frameworks based on flexible ligands (FL-MOFs): structures and applications
Lin, Z.-J., Lü, J., Hong, M., & Cao, R. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60483g · Cited by 874
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Water Harvesting from Air
Kalmutzki, M. J., Diercks, C. S., & Yaghi, O. M. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201704304 · Cited by 772
Perspective of microporous metal–organic frameworks for CO2capture and separation
Zhang, Z., Yao, Z.-Z., Xiang, S., & Chen, B. (2014) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee00143e · Cited by 767
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., Chen, D.-L., Sullivan, J. E., Kozlowski, M. T., Johnson, J. K., & Rosi, N. L.
- Venue
- Chemical Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1746
- ISSN
- 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-6539
- OpenAlex
- W1973809602
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
