The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting
Abstract
We report a facile one-step chemical method to synthesize partially reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays (NTAs). The NaBH4 treatment introduces oxygen vacancies on the surface and interior of TiO2. Oxygen vacancy extends the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NTAs from the UV to visible light region, and enhances the electrical conductivity as well as charge transportation. Surface oxygen vacancies serve as charge carrier traps as well as adsorption sites where the charge transfer to adsorbed species inhibits the surface charge recombination, whereas bulk oxygen vacancies tend to act as charge carrier traps where e–h recombination occurs. The optimally reduced TiO2 NTAs yield a photocurrent density of 0.73 mA cm−2 at 1.23 VRHE and a highest photoconversion efficiency of 1.31% at a rather low bias of 0.40 VRHE under a standard AM 1.5G solar illumination. Not only does the incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectrum increase in the UV region, but photoactivity in visible light also emerged. Surface oxygen vacancies, serving as electron donors, cause a noticeable negative flatband shift and increase the donor density of TiO2 NTAs 2-fold. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra confirm the presence of oxygen vacancies on the surface and interior of TiO2. Benefitting from the oxygen vacancy, a narrowed band gap of 2.46 eV and suitable localized states for hydrogen production are observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Surface Science Studies of the Photoactivation of TiO 2 New Photochemical Processes
Thompson, T. L., & Yates, J. T. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050172k · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Transition‐Metal (Co, Ni, and Fe)‐Based Electrocatalysts for the Water Oxidation Reaction
Han, L., Dong, S., & Wang, E. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201602270 · Cited by 1,769
One‐dimensional TiO2 Nanotube Photocatalysts for Solar Water Splitting
Ge, M., Li, Q., Cao, C., Huang, J., Li, S., Zhang, S., Chen, Z., Zhang, K., Al‐Deyab, S. S., & Lai, Y. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600152 · Cited by 555
Kapilashrami, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y.-S., Hagfeldt, A., & Guo, J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5000893 · Cited by 508
Self-citationAsnavandi, M., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Sun, C., & Zhao, C. (2018) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00696 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, Q., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, L., Xu, H., & Ye, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry A
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 5766
- ISSN
- 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-7496
- OpenAlex
- W2114927627
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ta10689f
- The paper
- Kang, Q., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, L., Xu, H., & Ye, J. (2013). Reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta10689f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.