The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CdS-decorated UiO–66(NH2) nanocomposites fabricated by a facile photodeposition process: an efficient and stable visible-light-driven photocatalyst for selective oxidation of alcohols
Abstract
CdS nanorods have been successfully decorated on the surface of MOF (metal–organic framework) UiO–66(NH2) via a facile room-temperature photodeposition technique in a controlled manner. Electrochemical measurements indicate that the CdS photodeposition proceeds via the preferential reduction of Cd ions to Cd0 followed by chemical reaction with S8. The photocatalytic performances of the obtained CdS–UiO–66(NH2) nanocomposites have been evaluated by selective oxidation of various alcohol substrates using molecular oxygen as a benign oxidant. The results show that such CdS–UiO–66(NH2) nanocomposites exhibit considerable photocatalytic activity and stability, which may be due to the large specific surface area and the charge injection from CdS into UiO–66(NH2) leads to efficient and longer charge separation by reducing the recombination of electron–hole pairs. This work represents the first example of using MOFs not only as supports but also as electron providers to trigger the reaction for coupling MOFs with metal sulfides, thus fabricating novel MOF–CdS nanocomposite systems and improving their photocatalytic activity. It is hoped that our findings could offer useful information and open a new window for the design of novel MOF–semiconductor nanocomposites as efficient visible light driven photocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Zong, X., Yan, H., Wu, G., Ma, G., Wen, F., Wang, L., & Li, C. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja8007825 · Cited by 1,884
Cited by
Catalysis and photocatalysis by metal organic frameworks
Dhakshinamoorthy, A., Li, Z., & Garcia, H. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00256h · Cited by 1,505
Multifunctional Metal–Organic Frameworks for Photocatalysis
Wang, S., & Wang, X. (2015) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201500084 · Cited by 615
Metal–Organic Frameworks as Photocatalysts for Solar-Driven Overall Water Splitting
Navalón, S., Dhakshinamoorthy, A., Álvaro, M., Ferrer, B., & García, H. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00460 · Cited by 538
Shi, L., Wang, T., Zhang, H., Chang, K., & Ye, J. (2015) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201502253 · Cited by 517
Modified metal-organic frameworks as photocatalysts
Qiu, J., Zhang, X., Feng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, H., & Yao, J. (2018) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.039 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, L., Liang, S., Wu, W., Liang, R., & Wu, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry A
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 11473
- ISSN
- 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-7496
- OpenAlex
- W2026330822
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CdS-decorated UiO–66(NH2) nanocomposites fabricated by a facile photodeposition process: an efficient and stable visible-light-driven photocatalyst for selective oxidation of alcohols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ta12645e
- The paper
- Shen, L., Liang, S., Wu, W., Liang, R., & Wu, L. (2013). CdS-decorated UiO–66(NH2) nanocomposites fabricated by a facile photodeposition process: an efficient and stable visible-light-driven photocatalyst for selective oxidation of alcohols. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta12645e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.