The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A facile approach using MgCl2 to formulate high performance Mg2+ electrolytes for rechargeable Mg batteries
Abstract
Rechargeable Mg batteries have been regarded as a viable battery technology for grid scale energy storage and transportation applications. However, the limited performance of Mg2+ electrolytes has been a primary technical hurdle to develop high energy density rechargeable Mg batteries. In this study, MgCl2 is demonstrated as a non-nucleophilic and cheap Mg2+ source in combination with Al Lewis acids (AlCl3, AlPh3 and AlEtCl2) to formulate a series of Mg2+ electrolytes, representing the simplest method to prepare Mg2+ conductive electrolytes (no precursor synthesis, free of recrystallization and giving quantitative yield). These electrolytes are characterized by high oxidation stability (up to 3.4 V vs. Mg), improved electrophile compatibility and electrochemical reversibility (up to 100% coulombic efficiency). Three electrolyte systems (MgCl2–AlCl3, MgCl2–AlPh3, and MgCl2–AlEtCl2) were fully characterized by multinuclear NMR (1H, 27Al{1H} and 25Mg{1H}) spectroscopies and electrochemical analysis. Single crystal X-ray diffraction and NMR studies consistently established molecular structures of the three electrolytes sharing a common Mg2+-dimer mono-cation, [(μ-Cl)3Mg2(THF)6]+, along with an anion (AlCl4−, AlPh3Cl− and AlEtCl3− respectively). Clean and dendrite free Mg bulk plating and viable battery performance were validated through representative studies using the MgCl2–AlEtCl2 electrolyte. The reaction mechanism of MgCl2 and the Al Lewis acids in THF is discussed to highlight the formation of the electrochemically active [(μ-Cl)3Mg2(THF)6]+ dimer mono-cation in these electrolytes and their improved performance compared to reported electrolytes using nucleophilic Mg2+ sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Current status and future directions of multivalent metal-ion batteries
Liang, Y., Dong, H., Aurbach, D., & Yao, Y. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0655-0 · Cited by 1,521
Odyssey of Multivalent Cathode Materials: Open Questions and Future Challenges
Canepa, P., Sai Gautam, G., Hannah, D. C., Malik, R., Liu, M., Gallagher, K. G., Persson, K. A., & Ceder, G. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00614 · Cited by 1,159
Rechargeable magnesium battery: Current status and key challenges for the future
Saha, P., Datta, M. K., Velikokhatnyi, O. I., Manivannan, A., Alman, D., & Kumta, P. N. (2014) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.04.001 · Cited by 649
Magnesium batteries: Current state of the art, issues and future perspectives
Mohtadi, R., & Mizuno, F. (2014) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.143 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, T., Shao, Y., Li, G., Gu, M., Hu, J., Xu, S., Nie, Z., Chen, X., Wang, C., & Liu, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry A
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3430
- ISSN
- 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-7496
- OpenAlex
- W1973035169
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A facile approach using MgCl2 to formulate high performance Mg2+ electrolytes for rechargeable Mg batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ta14825d
- The paper
- Liu, T., Shao, Y., Li, G., Gu, M., Hu, J., Xu, S., Nie, Z., Chen, X., Wang, C., & Liu, J. (2014). A facile approach using MgCl2 to formulate high performance Mg2+ electrolytes for rechargeable Mg batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta14825d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.