The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flexible metal–organic frameworks
Open accessAbstract
Advances in flexible and functional metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), also called soft porous crystals, are reviewed by covering the literature of the five years period 2009-2013 with reference to the early pertinent work since the late 1990s. Flexible MOFs combine the crystalline order of the underlying coordination network with cooperative structural transformability. These materials can respond to physical and chemical stimuli of various kinds in a tunable fashion by molecular design, which does not exist for other known solid-state materials. Among the fascinating properties are so-called breathing and swelling phenomena as a function of host-guest interactions. Phase transitions are triggered by guest adsorption/desorption, photochemical, thermal, and mechanical stimuli. Other important flexible properties of MOFs, such as linker rotation and sub-net sliding, which are not necessarily accompanied by crystallographic phase transitions, are briefly mentioned as well. Emphasis is given on reviewing the recent progress in application of in situ characterization techniques and the results of theoretical approaches to characterize and understand the breathing mechanisms and phase transitions. The flexible MOF systems, which are discussed, are categorized by the type of metal-nodes involved and how their coordination chemistry with the linker molecules controls the framework dynamics. Aspects of tailoring the flexible and responsive properties by the mixed component solid-solution concept are included, and as well examples of possible applications of flexible metal-organic frameworks for separation, catalysis, sensing, and biomedicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horike, S., Shimomura, S., & Kitagawa, S. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.444 · Cited by 2,486
Tan, J. C., & Cheetham, A. K. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00163e · Cited by 762
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Drug Delivery: A Design Perspective
Lawson, H. D., Walton, S. P., & Chan, C. (2021) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.1c01089 · Cited by 916
Metal–organic frameworks for membrane-based separations
Denny, M. S., Moreton, J. C., Benz, L., & Cohen, S. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.78 · Cited by 820
Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks-based hydrogels and aerogels and their applications
Wang, L., Xu, H., Gao, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, Q. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213016 · Cited by 594
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Food Safety
Wang, P.-L., Xie, L.-H., Joseph, E. A., Li, J.-R., Su, X.-O., & Zhou, H.-C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257 · Cited by 533
Coudert, F.-X. (2015) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00046 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneemann, A., Bon, V., Schwedler, I., Senkovska, I., Kaskel, S., & Fischer, R. A.
- Venue
- Chem. Soc. Rev.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014-05-30
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6062-6096
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2105631122
- Cited by
- 2,211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flexible metal–organic frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c4cs00101j
- The paper
- Schneemann, A., Bon, V., Schwedler, I., Senkovska, I., Kaskel, S., & Fischer, R. A. (2014). Flexible metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00101j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.