Functional graphene nanomesh foam
Abstract
Rationally designed graphene nanomesh assembled foam (GMF) with hierarchical pore arrangement has been successfully fabricated for the first time by a site-localized nanoparticle-induced etching strategy on the basis of hydrothermally self-assembled graphene architecture. The newly developed GMF provides a new material platform for developing high-performance functional devices. Specially, the N- and S-codoped GMF electrode exhibits excellent electrocatalytic activities for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), better than most of the graphene-based ORR catalysts reported previously.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nitrogen-doped graphene is a promising candidate for combining with MoS2 because of its excellent electrical conductivity, high chemical stability, and moderate catalytic activity for hydrogen evolution.
“Within the graphene family, nitrogen-doped graphene (NG) is one of the promising candidates because of its excellent electrical conductivity, high chemical stability, and moderate catalytic activity for hydrogen evolution.19,20”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
3D Graphene‐Based H<sub>2</sub>‐Production Photocatalyst and Electrocatalyst
Kuang, P., Sayed, M., Fan, J., Cheng, B., & Yu, J. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903802 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Hou, Y., Zhang, B., Wen, Z., Cui, S., Guo, X., He, Z., & Chen, J. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c4ta02254h · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Nitrogen-doped porous carbon/graphene aerogel with much enhanced capacitive behaviors
Wang, C., Huang, Y., Pan, H., Jiang, J., Yang, X., Xu, Z., Tian, H., Han, S., & Wu, D. (2016) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.077 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Aerogels-Inspired based Photo and Electrocatalyst for Water Splitting to Produce Hydrogen
Al-Hamamre, Z., Karimzadeh, Z., Ji, S., Choi, H., & Maleki, H. (2022) · Applied Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101670 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Hu, C., Song, L., Wang, L., Shi, G., Dai, L., & Qu, L.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Qu, Liangti
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1913
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2074014712
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 11
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy & Environmental Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
- Keywords
- hierarchical porous structure, hydrothermal self-assembly, oxygen reduction reaction, electrocatalysts, functional materials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
