The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of bacteriophage virion proteins by the ANOVA feature selection and analysis
Abstract
The bacteriophage virion proteins play extremely important roles in the fate of host bacterial cells. Accurate identification of bacteriophage virion proteins is very important for understanding their functions and clarifying the lysis mechanism of bacterial cells. In this study, a new sequence-based method was developed to identify phage virion proteins. In the new method, the protein sequences were initially formulated by the g-gap dipeptide compositions. Subsequently, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) with incremental feature selection (IFS) was used to search for the optimal feature set. It was observed that, in jackknife cross-validation, the optimal feature set including 160 optimized features can produce the maximum accuracy of 85.02%. By performing feature analysis, we found that the correlation between two amino acids with one gap was more important than other correlations for phage virion protein prediction and that some of the 1-gap dipeptides were important and mainly contributed to the virion protein prediction. This analysis will provide novel insights into the function of phage virion proteins. On the basis of the proposed method, an online web-server, PVPred, was established and can be freely accessed from the website (http://lin.uestc.edu.cn/server/PVPred). We believe that the PVPred will become a powerful tool to study phage virion proteins and to guide the related experimental validations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cd-hit: Accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S., & Li, W. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · Cited by 11,175
Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition
Chou, K.-C. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024 · Cited by 1,225
Cited by
Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Based on Machine Learning Algorithm
Deberneh, H. M., & Kim, I. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18063317 · Cited by 261
Sequence-based predictive modeling to identify cancerlectins
Lai, H.-Y., Chen, X.-X., Chen, W., Tang, H., & Lin, H. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15963 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, H., Feng, P.-M., Chen, W., & Lin, H.
- Venue
- Molecular BioSystems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-06-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2229-2235
- ISSN
- 1742-2051 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-206X
- OpenAlex
- W2131871423
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of bacteriophage virion proteins by the ANOVA feature selection and analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c4mb00316k
- The paper
- Ding, H., Feng, P.-M., Chen, W., & Lin, H. (2014). Identification of bacteriophage virion proteins by the ANOVA feature selection and analysis. Molecular BioSystems. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4mb00316k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.