Cited by 112Supercapacitor Materials and FabricationGraphene research and applicationsElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Graphene/carbon aerogels derived from graphene crosslinked polyimide as electrode materials for supercapacitors

Zhang, Youfang, Fan, Wei, Huang, Yunpeng, Zhang, Chao, Liu, Tianxi·2015·RSC Advances

Abstract

Graphene/carbon aerogels with hierarchical pores have been facilely prepared by carbonization of graphene/polyimide aerogels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4ra13015d

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 112

Authors
Zhang, Y., Fan, W., Huang, Y., Zhang, C., & Liu, T.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Tianxi
Venue
RSC Advances
Published
2015
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
1301-1308
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078396169
Cited by
112
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
RSC Advances (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
carbonization, hierarchical porous structure, supercapacitor electrode materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review