The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOF catalysis in relation to their homogeneous counterparts and conventional solid catalysts
Open accessAbstract
Metal–organic frameworks have recently attracted attention as heterogeneous catalysts due to their high content of metal centres and large surface area and pore volume, along with their impressive topological richness. Therefore, many studies describing the use of MOFs as heterogeneous Lewis acid catalysts have been published. In this regard, these efforts have been directed towards probing the catalytic activity. Further information is required in terms of kinetic parameters and comparison of performance with their homogeneous counterparts, or other conventional heterogeneous catalysts. Here we have attempted to put MOFs into perspective with respect to their homogeneous counterparts and more conventional heterogeneous catalysts to show their advantages and limitations. We have exemplified a number of reactions reported in the literature wherein MOFs have been used as catalysts, and we have carried them out using homogeneous counterparts, i.e. benzoates and acetates, and other well defined conventional solid catalysts. The activities and selectivities of the catalysts are compared and then put into perspective on the basis of kinetic parameters, such as turnover numbers and turnover frequencies. Additionally, we illustrate using selected examples what the potential advantages of MOF catalysts could be, and how they may outperform the potential of other solid catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism
Kresge, C. T., Leonowicz, M. E., Roth, W. J., Vartuli, J. C., & Beck, J. S. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359710a0 · Cited by 16,275
A New Zirconium Inorganic Building Brick Forming Metal Organic Frameworks with Exceptional Stability
Cavka, J. H., Jakobsen, S., Olsbye, U., Guillou, N., Lamberti, C., Bordiga, S., & Lillerud, K. P. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja8057953 · Cited by 7,336
Carbon Dioxide Capture in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Sumida, K., Rogow, D. L., Mason, J. A., McDonald, T. M., Bloch, E. D., Herm, Z. R., Bae, T.-H., & Long, J. R. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2003272 · Cited by 6,408
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
A Chemically Functionalizable Nanoporous Material [Cu 3 (TMA) 2 (H 2 O) 3 ] n
Chui, S. S.-Y., Lo, S. M.-F., Charmant, J. P. H., Orpen, A. G., & Williams, I. D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5405.1148 · Cited by 6,063
Luminescent Functional Metal–Organic Frameworks
Cui, Y., Yue, Y., Qian, G., & Chen, B. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200101d · Cited by 5,697
Metal–Organic Frameworks in Biomedicine
Horcajada, P., Gref, R., Baati, T., Allan, P. K., Maurin, G., Couvreur, P., Férey, G., Morris, R. E., & Serre, C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200256v · Cited by 4,168
Hydrogen Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Suh, M. P., Park, H. J., Prasad, T. K., & Lim, D.-W. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200274s · Cited by 3,689
Engineering Metal Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Catalysis
Corma, A., García, H., & Llabrés i Xamena, F. X. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003924 · Cited by 3,478
Self-citationEnantioselective catalysis with homochiral metal–organic frameworks
Ma, L., Abney, C., & Lin, W. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807083k · Cited by 3,109
Cited by
Yang, L., Zeng, X., Wang, W., & Cao, D. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201704537 · Cited by 772
Metal–organic framework gels and monoliths
Hou, J., Sapnik, A. F., & Bennett, T. D. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c9sc04961d · Cited by 331
Taking organic reactions over metal-organic frameworks as heterogeneous catalysis
Hu, M.-L., Safarifard, V., Doustkhah, E., Rostamnia, S., Morsali, A., Nouruzi, N., Beheshti, S., & Akhbari, K. (2018) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.07.057 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- García-García, P., Müller, M., & Corma, A.
- Venue
- Chemical Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2979
- ISSN
- 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-6539
- OpenAlex
- W2140462678
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOF catalysis in relation to their homogeneous counterparts and conventional solid catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c4sc00265b
- The paper
- García-García, P., Müller, M., & Corma, A. (2014). MOF catalysis in relation to their homogeneous counterparts and conventional solid catalysts. Chemical Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4sc00265b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
