The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origin of non-SEI related coulombic efficiency loss in carbons tested against Na and Li
Abstract
Partially ordered but not graphitized carbons are widely employed for sodium and lithium ion battery (NIB and LIB) anodes, either in their pure form or as a secondary supporting phase for oxides, sulfides and insertion electrodes. These “pseudographitic” materials ubiquitously display a poor initial coulombic efficiency (CE), which has been historically attributed to solid electrolyte interface (SEI) formation on their large surface areas (up to ∼2500 m2 g−1). Here we identify the other sources CE loss by examining a pseudographitic carbon with a state-of-the-art capacity (>350 mA h g−1 for NIB, >800 mA h g−1 for LIB), but with a purposely designed low surface area (14.5 m2 g−1) that disqualifies SEI from having a substantial role. During the initial several (<5) cycles both Na and Li are irreversibly trapped in the bulk, with the associated CE loss occurring at higher desodiation/delithiation voltages. We measure a progressively increasing graphene interlayer spacing and a progressively increasing Raman G band intensity, indicating that the charge carriers become trapped not only at the graphene defects but also between the graphene planes hence causing them to both dilate and order. For the case of Li, we also unambiguously detected irreversible metal underpotential deposition (“nanoplating”) within the nanopores at roughly below 0.2 V. It is expected that in conventional high surface area carbons these mechanisms will be a major contributor to CE loss in parallel to classic SEI formation. Key implications to emerge from these findings are that improvements in early cycling CE may be achieved by synthesizing pseudographitic carbons with lower levels of trapping defects, but that for LIBs the large cycle 1 CE loss may be unavoidable if highly porous structures are utilized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li, Z., Xu, Z., Tan, X., Wang, H., Holt, C. M. B., Stephenson, T., Olsen, B. C., & Mitlin, D. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee23599d · Cited by 1,054
Self-citation
Cited by
Wood-Derived Materials for Green Electronics, Biological Devices, and Energy Applications
Zhu, H., Luo, W., Ciesielski, P. N., Fang, Z., Zhu, J. Y., Henriksson, G., Himmel, M. E., & Hu, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225 · Cited by 1,532
Na-Ion Battery Anodes: Materials and Electrochemistry
Luo, W., Shen, F., Bommier, C., Zhu, H., Ji, X., & Hu, L. (2016) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00482 · Cited by 1,081
Sodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth
Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D., & Lee, S. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 · Cited by 940
Self-citationSaurel, D., Orayech, B., Xiao, B., Carriazo, D., Li, X., & Rojo, T. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201703268 · Cited by 668
Zhang, M., Li, Y., Wu, F., Bai, Y., & Wu, C. (2021) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105738 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Memarzadeh Lotfabad, E., Kalisvaart, P., Kohandehghan, A., Karpuzov, D., & Mitlin, D.
- Venue
- J. Mater. Chem. A
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014-10-14
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 19685-19695
- ISSN
- 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-7496
- OpenAlex
- W2081217929
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origin of non-SEI related coulombic efficiency loss in carbons tested against Na and Li. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c4ta04995k
- The paper
- Memarzadeh Lotfabad, E., Kalisvaart, P., Kohandehghan, A., Karpuzov, D., & Mitlin, D. (2014). Origin of non-SEI related coulombic efficiency loss in carbons tested against Na and Li. J. Mater. Chem. A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta04995k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.