Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon dots prepared from ginger exhibiting efficient inhibition of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Li, Chi-Lin, Ou, Chung-Mao, Huang, Chih-Ching, Wu, Wei-Cheng, Chen, Yi-Ping, Lin, Tzu-En, Ho, Lin-Chen, Wang, Chia-Wei, Shih, Chung-Chien, Zhou, Hang-Cheng, Lee, Ying-Chu, Tzeng, Woan-Fang, Chiou, Tzeon-Jye, Chu, Sin-Tak, Cang, Jinshun, Chang, Huan-Tsung·2014·Journal of Materials Chemistry B

Abstract

Fluorescent carbon nanodots (C-dots; 4.3 ± 0.8 nm) from fresh tender ginger juice provide high suppression of the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2), with low toxicity to normal mammary epithelial cells (MCF-10A) and normal liver cells (FL83B). The inhibition is selective to HepG2 over other tested cancer cells, including human lung cancer cell line (A549), human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231), and human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa). Western blot results reveal that the C-dots up-regulate the expression of p53 protein only in the HepG2 cell line. The 50% inhibiting concentration (IC50) value of the C-dots on HepG2 cells is 0.35 mg mL−1. Image cytometry results show significant uptake of C-dots by HepG2 cells that induce intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS, 18.2-fold increased), while other cells remain almost the same in ROS levels after treatment with C-dots (1.11 mg mL−1). The C-dots trigger the pro-apoptotic factor to promote HepG2 cell apoptosis. The C-dots effectively inhibit the growth of tumors in nude mice (104 ± 14 vs. 3.7 ± 0.2 mg with and without treatment within 14 days).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4tb00216d

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Li, C.-L., Ou, C.-M., Huang, C.-C., Wu, W.-C., Chen, Y.-P., Lin, T.-E., Ho, L.-C., Wang, C.-W., Shih, C.-C., Zhou, H.-C., Lee, Y.-C., Tzeng, W.-F., Chiou, T.-J., Chu, S.-T., Cang, J., & Chang, H.-T.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
Published
2014
Volume
2
Issue
28
Pages
4564
ISSN
  • 2050-750X (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7518
OpenAlex
W2078197540
Cited by
350
References
1
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon dots prepared from ginger exhibiting efficient inhibition of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c4tb00216d
The paper
Li, C.-L., Ou, C.-M., Huang, C.-C., Wu, W.-C., Chen, Y.-P., Lin, T.-E., Ho, L.-C., Wang, C.-W., Shih, C.-C., Zhou, H.-C., Lee, Y.-C., Tzeng, W.-F., Chiou, T.-J., Chu, S.-T., Cang, J., & Chang, H.-T. (2014). Carbon dots prepared from ginger exhibiting efficient inhibition of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tb00216d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.