Cited by 77Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchIdentification and Quantification in FoodFood and Agricultural Sciences

Is food allergen analysis flawed? Health and supply chain risks and a proposed framework to address urgent analytical needs

Open access
Walker, M. J., Burns, D. T., Elliott, C. T., Gowland, M. H., Mills, E. N. Clare·2016·The Analyst

Abstract

Food allergy is an increasing problem for those affected, their families or carers, the food industry and for regulators. The food supply chain is highly vulnerable to fraud involving food allergens, risking fatalities and severe reputational damage to the food industry. Many facets are being pursued to ameliorate the difficulties including better food labelling and the concept of thresholds of elicitation of allergy symptoms as risk management tools. These efforts depend to a high degree on the ability reliably to detect and quantify food allergens; yet all current analytical approaches exhibit severe deficiencies that jeopardise accurate results being produced particularly in terms of the risks of false positive and false negative reporting. If we fail to realise the promise of current risk assessment and risk management of food allergens through lack of the ability to measure food allergens reproducibly and with traceability to an international unit of measurement, the analytical community will have failed a significant societal challenge. Three distinct but interrelated areas of analytical work are urgently needed to address the substantial gaps identified: (a) a coordinated international programme for the production of properly characterised clinically relevant reference materials and calibrants for food allergen analysis; (b) an international programme to widen the scope of proteomics and genomics bioinformatics for the genera containing the major allergens to address problems in ELISA, MS and DNA methods; (c) the initiation of a coordinated international programme leading to reference methods for allergen proteins that provide results traceable to the SI. This article describes in more detail food allergy, the risks of inapplicable or flawed allergen analyses with examples and a proposed framework, including clinically relevant incurred allergen concentrations, to address the currently unmet and urgently required analytical requirements. Support for the above recommendations from food authorities, business organisations and National Measurement Institutes is important; however transparent international coordination is essential. Thus our recommendations are primarily addressed to the European Commission, the Health and Food Safety Directorate, DG Santé. A global multidisciplinary consortium is required to provide a curated suite of data including genomic and proteomic data on key allergenic food sources, made publically available on line.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c5an01457c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unexpected and unlabelled presence of milk in coconut water is a risk to persons with milk allergy.

    “The unexpected and unlabelled presence of a major allergen such as milk is a risk to persons with milk allergy (60) and a potential offence under food labelling law.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, M. J., Burns, D. T., Elliott, C. T., Gowland, M. H., & Mills, E. N. C.
Affiliations
  • LGC (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Allergy Action (GB)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Walker, M. J.
Venue
The Analyst
Published
2016
Volume
141
Issue
1
Pages
24-35
ISSN
  • 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5528
OpenAlex
W2169178156
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Analyst (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
food allergens, food allergy, reference materials, calibrants, SI traceability, bioinformatics, ELISA, mass spectrometry, false positives and false negatives, food labeling, risk management, international coordination
MeSH terms
Allergens, Animals, Food Analysis, Food Supply, Health, Humans, Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review