Is food allergen analysis flawed? Health and supply chain risks and a proposed framework to address urgent analytical needs
Open accessAbstract
Food allergy is an increasing problem for those affected, their families or carers, the food industry and for regulators. The food supply chain is highly vulnerable to fraud involving food allergens, risking fatalities and severe reputational damage to the food industry. Many facets are being pursued to ameliorate the difficulties including better food labelling and the concept of thresholds of elicitation of allergy symptoms as risk management tools. These efforts depend to a high degree on the ability reliably to detect and quantify food allergens; yet all current analytical approaches exhibit severe deficiencies that jeopardise accurate results being produced particularly in terms of the risks of false positive and false negative reporting. If we fail to realise the promise of current risk assessment and risk management of food allergens through lack of the ability to measure food allergens reproducibly and with traceability to an international unit of measurement, the analytical community will have failed a significant societal challenge. Three distinct but interrelated areas of analytical work are urgently needed to address the substantial gaps identified: (a) a coordinated international programme for the production of properly characterised clinically relevant reference materials and calibrants for food allergen analysis; (b) an international programme to widen the scope of proteomics and genomics bioinformatics for the genera containing the major allergens to address problems in ELISA, MS and DNA methods; (c) the initiation of a coordinated international programme leading to reference methods for allergen proteins that provide results traceable to the SI. This article describes in more detail food allergy, the risks of inapplicable or flawed allergen analyses with examples and a proposed framework, including clinically relevant incurred allergen concentrations, to address the currently unmet and urgently required analytical requirements. Support for the above recommendations from food authorities, business organisations and National Measurement Institutes is important; however transparent international coordination is essential. Thus our recommendations are primarily addressed to the European Commission, the Health and Food Safety Directorate, DG Santé. A global multidisciplinary consortium is required to provide a curated suite of data including genomic and proteomic data on key allergenic food sources, made publically available on line.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The unexpected and unlabelled presence of milk in coconut water is a risk to persons with milk allergy.
“The unexpected and unlabelled presence of a major allergen such as milk is a risk to persons with milk allergy (60) and a potential offence under food labelling law.”
From Authenticity and the Potability of Coconut Water - a Critical Review (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Authenticity and the Potability of Coconut Water - a Critical Review
Burns, D. T., Johnston, E. L., & Walker, M. J. (2020) · Journal of AOAC International · doi:10.1093/jaocint/qsz008 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationSimultaneous quantification of specific food allergen proteins using a fluorescent multiplex array
Filep, S. C., Reid Black, K., Smith, B. R. E., Block, D. S., Kuklinska-Pijanka, A., Bermingham, M., Oliver, M. A., Thorpe, C. M., Schuhmacher, Z. P., Agah, S., et al. (2022) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132986 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Walker, M. J., Burns, D. T., Elliott, C. T., Gowland, M. H., & Mills, E. N. C.
- Affiliations
- LGC (GB)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Allergy Action (GB)
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Walker, M. J.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-35
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2169178156
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Analyst (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Keywords
- food allergens, food allergy, reference materials, calibrants, SI traceability, bioinformatics, ELISA, mass spectrometry, false positives and false negatives, food labeling, risk management, international coordination
- MeSH terms
- Allergens, Animals, Food Analysis, Food Supply, Health, Humans, Risk
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review