The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: a low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades
Abstract
In the face of mounting evidence revealing active learning approaches result in improved student learning outcomes compared to traditional passive lecturing, there is a growing need to change the way instructors teach large introductory science courses. However, a large proportion of STEM faculty continues to use traditional instructor-centered lectures in their classrooms. In an effort to create a low barrier approach for the implementation of active learning pedagogies in introductory science courses, flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry course sequence have been created. Herein is described how student response systems (clickers) and problem-based case studies have been used to increase student engagement, and how flipped classroom modules have integrated these case studies as collaborative group problem solving activities in 250–500 seat lecture halls. Preliminary evaluation efforts found the flipped classroom modules provided convenient access to learning materials that increased the use of active learning in lecture and resulted in a significant improvement in the course grade point average (GPA) compared to a non-flipped class. These results suggest this approach to implementing a flipped classroom can act as a model for integrating active learning into large enrollment introductory chemistry courses that yields successful outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · Cited by 9,787
Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1374249 · Cited by 2,682
Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class
Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201783 · Cited by 1,270
Cited by
An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic
Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012 · Cited by 566
Mutambuki, J. M., Mwavita, M., Muteti, C. Z., Jacob, B. I., & Mohanty, S. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00254 · Cited by 70
Incorporating analytical research experience into the undergraduate curriculum
Thurbide, K. B. (2016) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-016-9703-9 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J.
- Venue
- Chemistry Education Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-208
- ISSN
- 1109-4028 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-1108
- OpenAlex
- W2188679835
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 57.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: a low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c5rp00159e
- The paper
- Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2016). Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: a low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00159e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.