Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combining solid-state NMR spectroscopy with first-principles calculations – a guide to NMR crystallography

Open access
Ashbrook, Sharon E., McKay, David·2016·Chemical Communications

Abstract

DFT calculations are an important tool in assigning and interpreting NMR spectra of solids: we discuss recent developments and their future potential in the context of NMR crystallography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6cc02542k

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Ashbrook, S. E., & McKay, D.
Venue
Chemical Communications
Published
2016
Volume
52
Issue
45
Pages
7186-7204
ISSN
  • 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-548X
OpenAlex
W2337713158
Cited by
283
References
65
FWCI
16.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining solid-state NMR spectroscopy with first-principles calculations – a guide to NMR crystallography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6cc02542k
The paper
Ashbrook, S. E., & McKay, D. (2016). Combining solid-state NMR spectroscopy with first-principles calculations – a guide to NMR crystallography. Chemical Communications. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc02542k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.