The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein–protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein–protein docking
Abstract
Understanding protein–protein interactions (PPIs) is quite important to elucidate crucial biological processes and even design compounds that interfere with PPIs with pharmaceutical significance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle mesh Ewald: An N ⋅log( N ) method for Ewald sums in large systems
Darden, T., York, D., & Pedersen, L. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464397 · Cited by 30,546
Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1977) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · Cited by 21,239
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
Hou, T., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100275a · Cited by 2,773
Self-citationStructure of SARS Coronavirus Spike Receptor-Binding Domain Complexed with Receptor
Li, F., Li, W., Farzan, M., & Harrison, S. C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116480 · Cited by 2,031
ZDOCK server: interactive docking prediction of protein–protein complexes and symmetric multimers
Pierce, B. G., Wiehe, K., Hwang, H., Kim, B.-H., Vreven, T., & Weng, Z. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097 · Cited by 1,760
The Ras-RasGAP Complex: Structural Basis for GTPase Activation and Its Loss in Oncogenic Ras Mutants
Scheffzek, K., Ahmadian, M. R., Kabsch, W., Wiesmüller, L., Lautwein, A., Schmitz, F., & Wittinghofer, A. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.333 · Cited by 1,543
Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO)
Weiser, J., Shenkin, P. S., & Still, W. C. (1999) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19990130)20:2<217::aid-jcc4>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 1,198
Free Energy Calculations by the Molecular Mechanics Poisson−Boltzmann Surface Area Method
Homeyer, N., & Gohlke, H. (2012) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201100135 · Cited by 1,168
Cited by
Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1448 · Cited by 184
“87 – 91 A very systematic study to predict the free energy of binding and to score docked complexes was recently performed by Chen et al. 89 The authors compared various force fields, protocols for performing MD simulations and using the Poisson – Boltzmann or the GB solvation model (not including…”
MethodCheng, W., & Ng, C. A. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01268 · Cited by 141
Clark, A. J., Negron, C., Hauser, K., Sun, M., Wang, L., Abel, R., & Friesner, R. A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.02.003 · Cited by 91
Evaluation of Predicted Protein–Protein Complexes by Binding Free Energy Simulations
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01022 · Cited by 59
Recent advances in automated protein design and its future challenges
Setiawan, D., Brender, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2018.1465922 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, F., Liu, H., Sun, H., Pan, P., Li, Y., Li, D., & Hou, T.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 22129-22139
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2470899874
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein–protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein–protein docking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6cp03670h
- The paper
- Chen, F., Liu, H., Sun, H., Pan, P., Li, Y., Li, D., & Hou, T. (2016). Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein–protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein–protein docking. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp03670h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
