Cited by 723D Printing in Biomedical ResearchTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Multi-functional scaling methodology for translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic applications using integrated microphysiological systems (MPS)

Open access
Maass, Christian, Stokes, Cynthia L., Griffith, Linda G., Cirit, Murat·2017·Integrative Biology

Abstract

Multi-functional scaling is a mechanistic framework to design integrated microphysiological systems for pharmacological applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6ib00243a

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is difficult to balance competing key functional indices in multi-OoC setups; for a gut-liver system, a perfusion rate chosen for the gut to yield proper metabolic rates might result in drug exposure times in the liver that are too short.

    “it has proven difficult to balance competing key indices in multi-OoC setups; for a gut–liver system139, for example, a perfusion rate chosen for the gut to yield proper metabolic rates might result in drug exposure times in the liver that are too short”

    From Human disease models in drug development (2023) · cites this paper as [139]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These considerations ensure correct translation of key functional indices from the model to in vivo conditions.

    “These considerations ensure the correct translation of the key functional indices from the model to in vivo conditions139”

    From Human disease models in drug development (2023) · cites this paper as [139]

    The Introduction describes functional scaling as a way to recapitulate selected in vivo functions, and the Results and Discussion report that multi-functional scaling captured drug-exposure times similar to those in vivo. But the paper does not say these considerations ensure correct translation of functional indices generally; it cautions that translation depends on adequately capturing in vivo physiology. The provided passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 72

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [27]ICRP Annals of the ICRP 2002 32 5 265 14506981
  2. [35]Borgstroem L Johansson C Larsson H Lenander R J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1981 9 419 429 7310641
  3. [41]Wooding-Scott RA Smalley J Visco J Slaughter RL Br J Clin Pharmac 1988 26 415 421 PMC1386563 3190991
  4. [42]McFayden ML Folb PI Miller R Marks IN Moshal MG Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1983 24 441 447 6305671
  5. [46]Tassaneeyakul W Kittiwattanagul K Vannaprasaht S Kampan J Tawalee A Puapairoj P Tiamkao S Juthagridsada S Kukongviriyapan V Tassaneeyakul W J Pharm Pharm Sci 2005 8 47 53 15946597
  6. [54]Korting-Schäfer M Bach N Knauf H Mutschler E Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1984 26 125 127 6714285
  7. [69]Obach RS Drug Metab Dispos 1997 25 1359 1369 9394025

Authors
Maass, C., Stokes, C. L., Griffith, L. G., & Cirit, M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stokes Consulting
Corresponding author
Cirit, Murat
Venue
Integrative Biology
Published
2017
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
290-302
ISSN
  • 1757-9694 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-9708
OpenAlex
W2594151080
Cited by
72
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Integrative Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF-12-2-0039)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
microphysiological systems, scaling methods, mechanistic modeling, allometric scaling, drug exposure, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug absorption and metabolism, exposure-response relationship
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Kidney, Liver, Models, Biological, Pharmacokinetics, Cell Culture Techniques, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review