The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanism for excitation-dependent photoluminescence from graphene quantum dots and other graphene oxide derivates: consensus, debates and challenges
Abstract
Luminescent nanomaterials, with wide applications in biosensing, bioimaging, illumination and display techniques, have been consistently garnering enormous research attention. In particular, those with wavelength-controllable emissions could be highly beneficial. Carbon nanostructures, including graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and other graphene oxide derivates (GODs), with excitation-dependent photoluminescence (PL), which means their fluorescence color could be tuned simply by changing the excitation wavelength, have attracted lots of interest. However the intrinsic mechanism for the excitation-dependent PL is still obscure and fiercely debated presently. In this review, we attempt to summarize the latest efforts to explore the mechanism, including the quantum confinement effect, surface traps model, giant red-edge effect, edge states model and electronegativity of heteroatom model, as well as the newly developed synergistic model, to seek some clues to unravel the mechanism. Meanwhile the controversial difficulties for each model are further discussed. Besides this, the challenges and potential influences of the synthetic methodology and development of the materials are illustrated extensively to elicit more thought and constructive attempts toward their application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1849 · Cited by 39,979
Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts
Xiang, Q., Yu, J., & Jaroniec, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15172j · Cited by 2,730
Glowing Graphene Quantum Dots and Carbon Dots: Properties, Syntheses, and Biological Applications
Zheng, X. T., Ananthanarayanan, A., Luo, K. Q., & Chen, P. (2015) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201402648 · Cited by 2,190
One-step synthesis of fluorescent carbon nanoparticles by laser irradiation
Hu, S.-L., Niu, K.-Y., Sun, J., Yang, J., Zhao, N.-Q., & Du, X.-W. (2009) · J. Mater. Chem. · doi:10.1039/b812943f · Cited by 968
Cited by
Ding, H., Wei, J., Zhang, P., Zhou, Z., Gao, Q., & Xiong, H. (2018) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201800612 · Cited by 667
Carbon-based nanomaterials as an emerging platform for theranostics
Patel, K. D., Singh, R. K., & Kim, H.-W. (2019) · Materials Horizons · doi:10.1039/c8mh00966j · Cited by 555
Recent progress in two-dimensional inorganic quantum dots
Xu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, W. L., Lv, F., & Guo, S. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00500h · Cited by 304
Nguyen, K. G., Baragau, I.-A., Gromicova, R., Nicolaev, A., Thomson, S. A. J., Rennie, A., Power, N. P., Sajjad, M. T., & Kellici, S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-16893-x · Cited by 269
Amorphous Carbon Dots and their Remarkable Ability to Detect 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol
Siddique, A. B., Pramanick, A. K., Chatterjee, S., & Ray, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28021-9 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Gan, Z., Xu, H., & Hao, Y.
- Venue
- Nanoscale
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7794-7807
- ISSN
- 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-3372
- OpenAlex
- W2298991223
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism for excitation-dependent photoluminescence from graphene quantum dots and other graphene oxide derivates: consensus, debates and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6nr00605a
- The paper
- Gan, Z., Xu, H., & Hao, Y. (2016). Mechanism for excitation-dependent photoluminescence from graphene quantum dots and other graphene oxide derivates: consensus, debates and challenges. Nanoscale. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr00605a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.