The DOI matches its Crossref record; 222 of the 223 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precision and correctness in the evaluation of electrocatalytic water splitting: revisiting activity parameters with a critical assessment
Abstract
To avoid unnoticed errors made by researchers who are working in the area of nanostructured materials for water splitting, the correct and precise use of evaluation parameters is discussed in detail, stating their acceptability and validity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“potential compensation (iR compensation) has to be performed to guarantee that the reaction proceeds under the desired condition (e.g., in the chronopotentiometry experiments) and/or to determine the overpotential correctly.47,50”
From An energy-saving support made of silver nanowire aerogel for hydrogen evolution reaction (2023) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications
Bard, A. J., & Faulkner, L. R. (1980) · Cited by 22,436
Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Peters, J. C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja407115p · Cited by 7,026
A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis
Carmo, M., Fritz, D., Mergel, J., & Stolten, D. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 · Cited by 5,785
Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting
Hisatomi, T., Kubota, J., & Domen, K. (2014) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60378d · Cited by 4,636
Trotochaud, L., Young, S. L., Ranney, J. K., & Boettcher, S. W. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja502379c · Cited by 3,623
Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications
Zeng, K., & Zhang, D. (2010) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.002 · Cited by 3,611
Lee, Y., Suntivich, J., May, K. J., Perry, E. E., & Shao‐Horn, Y. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz2016507 · Cited by 3,550
Theory and Application of Cyclic Voltammetry for Measurement of Electrode Reaction Kinetics.
Nicholson, R. S. (1965) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60230a016 · Cited by 3,471
TiO 2 Photocatalysis: A Historical Overview and Future Prospects
Hashimoto, K., Irie, H., & Fujishima, A. (2005) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1143/jjap.44.8269 · Cited by 3,429
Shinagawa, T., Garcia-Esparza, A. T., & Takanabe, K. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13801 · Cited by 3,287
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Malik, 2017, Catal. Sci. Technol., 19, 16
- Chen, 2001, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 4623, 10.1021/jp010038d · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis – A review
Kumar, S. S., & Himabindu, V. (2019) · Materials Science for Energy Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.mset.2019.03.002 · Cited by 2,392
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
Non‐Noble‐Metal‐Based Electrocatalysts toward the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Wu, Z., Lu, X. F., Zang, S., & Lou, X. W. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201910274 · Cited by 1,235
Advanced Transition Metal‐Based OER Electrocatalysts: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges
Zhang, K., & Zou, R. (2021) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202100129 · Cited by 1,050
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of Metal Oxide Electrodes for Energy Applications
Bredar, A. R. C., Chown, A. L., Burton, A. R., & Farnum, B. H. (2020) · ACS Applied Energy Materials · doi:10.1021/acsaem.9b01965 · Cited by 1,032
Metadata
- Authors
- Anantharaj, S., Ede, S. R., Karthick, K., Sam Sankar, S., Sangeetha, K., Karthik, P. E., & Kundu, S.
- Affiliations
- Central Electrochemical Research Institute (IN)
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)
- Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kundu, Subrata
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 744-771
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2787901841
- Cited by
- 1,632
- References
- 223
- Citations by year
- 2026: 163 · 2025: 222 · 2024: 234 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 251 · 2021: 221 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 33
- FWCI
- 31.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy & Environmental Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
- University Grants Commission
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Keywords
- electrochemical water splitting, evaluation metrics, nanostructured electrocatalysts, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
