Cited by 87Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

Chemical-PDMS binding kinetics and implications for bioavailability in microfluidic devices

Open access
Auner, Alexander W., Tasneem, Kazi M., Markov, Dmitry A., McCawley, Lisa J., Hutson, M. Shane·2019·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

Microfluidic organ-on-chip devices constructed from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) have proven useful in studying both beneficial and adverse effects of drugs, supplements, and potential toxicants. Despite multiple advantages, one clear drawback of PDMS-based devices is binding of hydrophobic chemicals to their exposed surfaces. Chemical binding to PDMS can change the timing and extent of chemical delivery to cells in such devices, potentially altering dose-response curves. Recent efforts have quantified PDMS binding for selected chemicals. Here, we test a wider set of nineteen chemicals using UV-vis or infrared spectroscopy to characterize loss of chemical from solution in two setups with different PDMS-surface-to-solution-volume ratios. We find discernible PDMS binding for eight chemicals and show that PDMS binding is strongest for chemicals with a high octanol-water partition coefficient (log P > 1.85) and low H-bond donor number. Further, by measuring depletion and return of chemical from solution over tens to hundreds of hours and fitting these results to a first order model of binding kinetics, we characterize partitioning into PDMS in terms of binding capacities per unit surface area and both forward and reverse rate constants. These fitted parameters were used to model the impact of PDMS binding on chemical transport and bioavailability under realistic flow conditions and device geometry. The models predict that PDMS binding could alter in-device cellular exposures for both continuous and bolus dosing schemes by up to an order of magnitude compared to nominal input doses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8lc00796a

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 87

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [7]Jo BH, Van Lerberghe LM, Motsegood KM and Beebe DJ, J. Microeletromech. Syst., 2009, 9, 76– 81.
  2. [13]D. HN and A. FP, J. Appl. Toxicol., 2011, 33, 265– 272.21935973
  3. [29]Pei R-J, Sato M, Yuri T, Danbara N, Nikaido Y and Tsubura A, In Vivo, 2003, 17, 349– 357. 12929590
  4. [34]Dieras V, Oncology, 1997, 11, 31– 33. 9364539
  5. [48]Gao X and Chorover J, Environ. Chem., 2012, 9, 148– 157.
  6. [50]Gervais T and Jensen KF, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2006, 61, 1102– 1121.
  7. [51]Byron G, Daniel C, Xiaoyi H, A. R. Pand Carla W, J. Mol. Recognit., 1999, 12, 293– 299.10556877
  8. [56]Baltussen E, Sandra P, David F and Cramers C, J. Microcolumn Sep., 1999, 11, 737– 747.

Authors
Auner, A. W., Tasneem, K. M., Markov, D. A., McCawley, L. J., & Hutson, M. S.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Hutson, M. Shane
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2019
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
864-874
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2912840511
Cited by
87
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lab on a Chip (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (8357360)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01 CA202229-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Keywords
bioavailability, microfluidic drug delivery, octanol-water partition coefficient, hydrophobic compounds, binding capacity, chemical transport modeling, bolus dosing, continuous dosing, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Biological Availability, Dimethylpolysiloxanes, Kinetics, Molecular Structure, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Lab-On-A-Chip Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review