Cited by 89Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesHydrogen Storage and Materials

Epitaxial growth of Ni(OH) 2 nanoclusters on MoS 2 nanosheets for enhanced alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction

Zhao, Guoqiang, Lin, Yue, Rui, Kun, Zhou, Qian, Chen, Yaping, Dou, Shi Xue, Sun, Wenping·2018·Nanoscale

Abstract

Constructing heterostructures is an effective strategy for designing efficient electrocatalysts. MoS2 is a star catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in acidic media; however, the alkaline HER activity is deficient due to the sluggish water dissociation process. Herein, Ni(OH)2/MoS2 heterostructures with Ni(OH)2 nanoclusters epitaxially decorated on the surface of MoS2 are synthesized towards the alkaline HER. As compared with MoS2, the epitaxial Ni(OH)2/MoS2 heterostructures show significantly enhanced HER activity in 1 M KOH, and the overpotential is decreased by nearly 150 mV to reach a current density of 10 mA cm-2. The substantial increase in turnover frequency (TOF) demonstrates that the intrinsic activity is greatly improved after the incorporation of Ni(OH)2 nanoclusters. The presence of Ni(OH)2 nanoclusters would provide additional water dissociation sites while MoS2 is ready for the adsorption and combination of the generated H*, and this so-called synergistic effect eventually induces significantly enhanced alkaline HER kinetics. Besides, the electron transfer from Ni(OH)2 to MoS2 increases the proton affinity of MoS2. The present results describe an interesting case of an atomic-scale electrochemically inert material promoted HER process, and would open a new avenue into designing efficient hetero-nanostructures towards electrocatalytic applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8nr07045h

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, G., Lin, Y., Rui, K., Zhou, Q., Chen, Y., Dou, S. X., & Sun, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Lin, Yue
  • Sun, Wenping
Venue
Nanoscale
Published
2018
Volume
10
Issue
40
Pages
19074-19081
ISSN
  • 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-3372
OpenAlex
W2891910108
Cited by
89
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nanoscale (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DE160100596)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11404314)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1708085MA06)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Keywords
alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction, MoS2 nanosheets, heterostructures, epitaxial growth, electrocatalysts, water dissociation, electron transfer, proton affinity, turnover frequency, overpotential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review