CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 297Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Carved nanoframes of cobalt–iron bimetal phosphide as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for efficient overall water splitting

Open access
Lian, Yuebin, Sun, Hao, Wang, Xuebin, Qi, Pengwei, Mu, Qiaoqiao, Chen, Yujie, Ye, Jing, Zhao, Xiaohui +2 more·2019·Chemical Science
DOI 10.1039/c8sc03877ePMC PMC6334264
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Nanoframes of cobalt–iron bimetal phosphide enhance both HER and OER activities towards efficient overall water splitting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8sc03877e

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HRTEM interplanar spacings of 0.17, 0.19 and 0.25 nm are assigned to the (103), (211) and (111) planes of the CFP NFs, respectively.

    “the interplanar spacing of 0.17, 0.19 and 0.25 nm are assigned to the (103), (211) and (111) planes of the CFP NFs, respectively [26,27].”

    From Encapsulating hollow (Co,Fe)P nanoframes into N,P-codoped graphene aerogel for highly efficient water splitting (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results and discussion section reports different HR-TEM measurements for the Co₀.₆Fe₀.₄P nanoframes: 0.282, 0.231 and 0.188 nm, assigned to the (110), (102) and (112) planes, respectively. It does not assign the claimed spacings to the claimed planes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • While partial or complete dissolution of heteroatoms such as B and P after HER has been reported, this was not observed in this study, implying that no leaching occurred.

    “Notably, while partial or complete dissolution of heteroatoms such as B and P after HER has been reported in some works,52 this was not observed in this study, implying that no leaching occurred.”

    From Iron–Cobalt Nanoparticles Embedded in B,N-Doped Chitosan-Derived Porous Carbon Aerogel for Overall Water Splitting (2024) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results and discussion report phosphorus loss after HER: its measured atomic ratio fell from 32% before electrolysis to 16% afterward. This supports the cited example of partial P loss, but the paper does not report boron loss or complete phosphorus loss after HER. The statement that leaching was not observed in the citing authors’ study is their own finding, not a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 297

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Turner J. A. Science 2004 305 972 15310892
  2. Gray H. B. Nat. Chem. 2009 1 7 21378780
  3. Cook T. R. Dogutan D. K. Reece S. Y. Surendranath Y. Teets T. S. Nocera D. G. Chem. Rev. 2010 110 6474 6502 21062098
  4. Walter M. G. Warren E. L. McKone J. R. Boettcher S. W. Mi Q. Santori E. A. Lewis N. S. Chem. Rev. 2010 110 6446 6473 21062097
  5. Morales-Guio C. G. Stern L. A. Hu X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014 43 6555 6569 24626338
  6. Han L. Dong S. Wang E. Adv. Mater. 2016 28 9266 9291 27569575
  7. Zhang W. Lai W. Cao R. Chem. Rev. 2017 117 3717 3797 28222601
  8. Jin H. Wang J. Su D. Wei Z. Pang Z. Wang Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015 137 2688 2694 25658518
  9. Wu Z. Wang J. Han L. Lin R. Liu H. Xin H. L. Wang D. Nanoscale 2016 8 4681 4687 26853996
  10. Chen Z. Ha Y. Liu Y. Wang H. Yang H. Xu H. Li Y. Wu R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018 10 7134 7144 29417808
  11. Shi X. Fujitsuka M. Kim S. Majima T. Small 2018 14 e1703277 29377559
  12. Fan X. Peng Z. Ye R. Zhou H. Guo X. ACS Nano 2015 9 7407 7418 26126147
  13. Liu Y. Yu G. Li G. D. Sun Y. Asefa T. Chen W. Zou X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 10752 10757 26212796
  14. Huang Y. Gong Q. Song X. Feng K. Nie K. Zhao F. Wang Y. Zeng M. Zhong J. Li Y. ACS Nano 2016 10 11337 11343 28024342
  15. Luo J. Im J. H. Mayer M. T. Schreier M. Nazeeruddin M. K. Park N. G. Tilley S. D. Fan H. J. Gratzel M. Science 2014 345 1593 1596 25258076
  16. Chen G. Wang T. Zhang J. Liu P. Sun H. Zhuang X. Chen M. Feng X. Adv. Mater. 2018 30 1706279 29349907
  17. Ledendecker M. Krick Calderon S. Papp C. Steinruck H. P. Antonietti M. Shalom M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 12361 12365 26129698
  18. Xiao X. Tao L. Li M. Lv X. Huang D. Jiang X. Pan H. Wang M. Shen Y. Chem. Sci. 2018 9 1970 1975 29675243 PMC5892309
  19. Chung D. Y. Jun S. W. Yoon G. Kim H. Yoo J. M. Lee K. S. Kim T. Shin H. Sinha A. K. Kwon S. G. Kang K. Hyeon T. Sung Y. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017 139 6669 6674 28437070
  20. Yu F. Zhou H. Q. Huang Y. F. Sun J. Y. Qin F. Bao J. M. Goddardiii W. A. Chen S. Ren Z. F. Nat. Commun. 2018 9 2551 29959325 PMC6026163
  21. Pu Z. Amiinu I. S. Zhang C. Wang M. Kou Z. Mu S. Nanoscale 2017 9 3555 3560 28244521
  22. Pu Z. Amiinu I. S. Kou Z. Li W. Mu S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017 56 11559 11564 28696513
  23. Han A. Zhang H. Yuan R. Ji H. Du P. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017 9 2240 2248 28008761
  24. Jiang N. You B. Sheng M. Sun Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 6251 6254 25900260
  25. Zhang P. Guan B. Y. Yu L. Lou X. W. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017 56 7141 7145 28488748
  26. Yu L. Yang J. F. Guan B. Y. Lu Y. Lou X. W. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018 57 172 176 29178355
  27. Tang C. Zhang R. Lu W. Wang Z. Liu D. Hao S. Du G. Asiri A. M. Sun X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017 56 842 27976509
  28. Chen C. Kang Y. Huo Z. Zhu Z. Huang W. Xin H. L. Snyder J. D. Li D. Herron J. A. Mavrikakis M. Chi M. More K. L. Li Y. Markovic N. M. Somorjai G. A. Yang P. Stamenkovic V. R. Science 2014 343 1339 1343 24578531
  29. Wang X. Feng J. Bai Y. Zhang Q. Yin Y. Chem. Rev. 2016 116 10983 11060 27156483
  30. Bai Y. Fang L. Xu H. Gu X. Zhang H. Wang Y. Small 2017 13 1603718 28165204
  31. Zhuang M. Ou X. Dou Y. Zhang L. Zhang Q. Wu R. Ding Y. Shao M. Luo Z. Nano Lett. 2016 16 4691 4698 27267432
  32. Xia C. Jiang Q. Zhao C. Hedhili M. N. Alshareef H. N. Adv. Mater. 2016 28 77 85 26540620
  33. Li Y. P. Liu J. D. Chen C. Zhang X. H. Chen J. H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017 9 5982 5991 28121122
  34. Guan B. Y. Yu L. Lou X. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017 56 2386 2389 28102962
  35. Liu M. Li J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015 8 2158 2165 26711014
  36. Zhang R. Wang X. Yu S. Wen T. Zhu X. Yang F. Sun X. Wang X. Hu W. Adv. Mater. 2017 29 1605502 28028846
  37. He P. Yu X. Y. Lou X. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017 56 3897 3900 28244625
  38. Pu Z. Zhang C. Amiinu I. S. Li W. Wu L. Mu S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017 9 16187 16193 28452469
  39. Nai J. Lu Y. Yu L. Wang X. Lou X. W. D. Adv. Mater. 2017 29 1703870 28922495
  40. Yu X. Y. Yu L. Wu H. B. Lou X. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 5331 5335 25702684
  41. Han L. Yu X. Y. Lou X. W. Adv. Mater. 2016 28 4601 4605 27008038
  42. Nai J. Guan B. Y. Yu L. Lou X. W. D. Sci. Adv. 2017 3 e1700732 28845450 PMC5567758
  43. Nai J. Lou X. W. D. Adv. Mater. 2018 10.1002/adma.201706825 · DOI
  44. Nai J. Lu Y. Yu L. Wang X. Lou X. W. D. Adv. Mater. 2017 29 1703870 28922495
  45. Sun M. H. Huang S. Z. Chen L. H. Li Y. Yang X. Y. Yuan Z. Y. Su B. L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016 45 3479 3563 27255561
  46. Parlett C. M. Wilson K. Lee A. F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013 42 3876 3893 23139061
  47. Wu H. B. Xia B. Y. Yu L. Yu X. Y. Lou X. W. Nat. Commun. 2015 6 6512 25758159 PMC4382699
  48. Pu Z. Saana Amiinu I. Wang M. Yang Y. Mu S. Nanoscale 2016 8 8500 8504 27065023
  49. Hao J. Yang W. Zhang Z. Tang J. Nanoscale 2015 7 11055 11062 26052656
  50. Tang C. Gan L. Zhang R. Lu W. Jiang X. Asiri A. M. Sun X. Wang J. Chen L. Nano Lett. 2016 16 6617 6621 27676264
  51. Shi Y. Zhang B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016 45 1781 26857838
  52. Liu P. Rodriguez J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005 127 14871 14878 16231942

Authors
Lian, Y., Sun, H., Wang, X., Qi, P., Mu, Q., Chen, Y., Ye, J., Zhao, X., Deng, Z., & Peng, Y.
Affiliations
Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Deng, Zhao
  • Peng, Yang
ORCID
Venue
Chemical Science
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2019
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
464-474
ISSN
  • 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-6539
DOI
10.1039/c8sc03877e
PMC
PMC6334264
OpenAlex
W2896973962
Cited by
297
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 25
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Chemical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160323, BK20161209)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21701118)
  • Suzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (SYG201748)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
nanoframes, bifunctional electrocatalysts, overall water splitting, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review