Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 336 of the 336 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulating electrodeposition morphology of lithium: towards commercially relevant secondary Li metal batteries

Open access
Zheng, Jingxu, Kim, Mun Sek, Tu, Zhengyuan, Choudhury, Snehashis, Tang, Tian, Archer, Lynden A.·2020·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

Rational approaches for achieving fine control of the electrodeposition morphology of Li are required to create commercially-relevant rechargeable Li metal batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c9cs00883g

Cites

336 of 336 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 336 references

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, J., Kim, M. S., Tu, Z., Choudhury, S., Tang, T., & Archer, L. A.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2020
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
2701-2750
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W3013909127
Cited by
466
References
336
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulating electrodeposition morphology of lithium: towards commercially relevant secondary Li metal batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c9cs00883g
The paper
Zheng, J., Kim, M. S., Tu, Z., Choudhury, S., Tang, T., & Archer, L. A. (2020). Regulating electrodeposition morphology of lithium: towards commercially relevant secondary Li metal batteries. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00883g

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.