Cited by 197Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringTechnology Assessment and ManagementEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to assess the potential of emerging green technologies? Towards a prospective environmental and techno-economic assessment framework

Open access
Thomassen, Gwenny, Van Dael, Miet, Van Passel, Steven, You, Fengqi·2019·Green Chemistry

Abstract

The prospective environmental techno-economic assessment framework is proposed, gathering best practices to assess the potential of emerging green chemical technologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c9gc02223f

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 116 references

1 of the 116 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. European Commission , Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2016-2017 , 2017
  2. H. Naims , B.Olfe-Kräutlein , A. M.Lorente Lafuente and T.Bruhn , CO2 recycling - An option for policymaking and society? , Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies , Potsdam , 2015
  3. A. Bjørn , M.Owsianiak , C.Molin and M. Z.Hauschild , in Life Cycle Assessment. Theory and Practice , ed. M. Z. Hauschild , S. I. Olsen and R. K. Rosenbaum , Springer , 2018 , pp. 17–30
  4. European Union, 2013, Official Journal of the European Union, 56, 210
  5. UN Environment , Life Cycle Initiative progress report 2018 , 2018
  6. Gifford, 2016, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 3, 1351
  7. Frischknecht, 2007, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 1, 7
  8. M. Van Dael , T.Kuppens , S.Lizin and S.Van Passel , in Production of biofuels and chemical: Ultrasound , ed. R. L. Zhen Fang , J. Smith and X. Qi , Springer Book Series: Biofuels and Biorefineries, 2014
  9. M. S. Peters , K. D.Timmerhaus and R. E.West , Plant design and economics for chemical engineers , Fifth Edition , McGraw-Hill , New York , 2003
  10. Vatavuk, 2002, Chem. Eng., 109, 62

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–197 of 197

Metadata

Authors
Thomassen, G., Van Dael, M., Van Passel, S., & You, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • UHasselt
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Thomassen, Gwenny
  • You, Fengqi
Venue
Green Chemistry
Published
2019
Volume
21
Issue
18
Pages
4868-4886
ISSN
  • 1463-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9270
OpenAlex
W2969157711
Cited by
197
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Green Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CAREER)
  • Universiteit Antwerpen
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Technology Assessment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
technology assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review