Cited by 22Laser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

Clean rhodium nanoparticles prepared by laser ablation in liquid for high performance electrocatalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction

Open access
Volpato, Giulia Alice, Muneton Arboleda, David, Brandiele, Riccardo, Carraro, Francesco, Sartori, Giovanni Battista, Cardelli, Andrea, Badocco, Denis, Pastore, Paolo +4 more·2019·Nanoscale Advances

Abstract

Rhodium nanoparticles prepared by a facile laser ablation procedure show excellent activity towards the hydrogen evolution reaction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c9na00510b

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HER reaction kinetics in alkaline or neutral media is much lower than in acidic media.

    “Generally, HER reaction kinetics in alkaline or neutral media is much lower than that in acidic media.[18,19]”

    From Functionalized Ultrafine Rhodium Nanoparticles on Graphene Aerogels for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

    The passages labeled Abstract (page unavailable) report that both Rh catalysts required greater overpotential to reach −10 mA cm−2 in alkaline KOH than in acidic H2SO4, supporting slower HER performance for those catalysts under alkaline conditions. The paper does not address neutral media, and its catalyst-specific comparison does not establish the claim as a general rule. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The poor durability of the commercial 20% Pt/C electrocatalyst may originate from weak cohesion between the carbon substrate and Pt nanoparticles, which results in aggregation and/or exfoliation of nanoparticles.

    “The poor durability of commercial 20% Pt/C electrocatalyst may originate from the weak cohesion between carbon substrate and Pt nanoparticles, which easily results in the aggregation and/or exfoliation of nanoparticles.[18]”

    From Functionalized Ultrafine Rhodium Nanoparticles on Graphene Aerogels for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

    The stability passage (page not specified) attributes poor stability of Rh/C inks during cycling to adhesion of the ink coating to a glassy-carbon electrode. The passages comparing commercial Pt/C report electrocatalytic performance, not its durability. A search for Pt/C durability and nanoparticle cohesion found no passage linking weak Pt–carbon cohesion to aggregation or exfoliation. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Zhu L. Lin H. Li Y. Liao F. Lifshitz Y. Sheng M. Lee S. T. Shao M. Nat. Commun. 2016 7 1 7 PMC4961846 27447292
  2. Yu N. F. Tian N. Zhou Z. Y. Huang L. Xiao J. Wen Y. H. Sun S. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014 53 5097 5101 24692362

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volpato, G. A., Muneton Arboleda, D., Brandiele, R., Carraro, F., Sartori, G. B., Cardelli, A., Badocco, D., Pastore, P., Agnoli, S., Durante, C., Amendola, V., & Sartorel, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Centro de Investigaciones Ópticas CIOp (CONICET-CIC-UNLP)
Corresponding author
  • Durante, Christian
  • Amendola, Vincenzo
  • Sartorel, Andrea
Venue
Nanoscale Advances
Published
2019
Volume
1
Issue
11
Pages
4296-4300
ISSN
2516-0230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981080718
Cited by
22
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nanoscale Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Università degli Studi di Padova (Iniziative di Cooperazione Universitaria 2017, PHOETRY, P-DiSC #10BIRD2018-UNIPD, STARS grant “4NANOMED”)
  • Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale (Italy-Argentine Great relevance project)
  • Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Keywords
rhodium nanoparticles, laser ablation in liquid, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, water-based synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review