Cited by 357Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Target identification among known drugs by deep learning from heterogeneous networks

Open access
Zeng, Xiangxiang, Zhu, Siyi, Lu, Weiqiang, Liu, Zehui, Huang, Jin, Zhou, Yadi, Fang, Jiansong, Huang, Yin +7 more·2020·Chemical Science

Abstract

Target identification and drug repurposing could benefit from network-based, rational deep learning prediction, and explore the relationship between drugs and targets in the heterogeneous drug–gene–disease network.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c9sc04336e

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning is increasingly being explored as target identification technology, often by means of knowledge graphs.

    “Although novel drug targets are typically identified through genomic, proteomic or phenotypic experiments, machine learning is increasingly being explored as target identification technology (52), often by means of knowledge graphs (53).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 141 · Cited by 357

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cao S. S., Lu W. and Xu Q. K., Thirtieth Aaai Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016, pp. 1145–1152
  2. Natarajan N., Rao N. and Dhillon I., 2015 LEEE 6th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (Camsap), 2015, pp. 37–40
  3. Blaney S. M. Cole D. E. Balis F. M. Godwin K. Poplack D. G. Cancer Res. 1993 53 725 727 8428353
  4. O'Boyle N. M. Banck M. James C. A. Morley C. Vandermeersch T. Hutchison G. R. J. Cheminf. 2011 3 33 PMC3198950 21982300
  5. Koren Y. Bell R. Volinsky C. IEEE Comput. Soc. Press 2009 42 30 37
  6. Hu X. Wang Y. Hao L.-Y. Liu X. Lesch C. A. Sanchez B. M. Wendling J. M. Morgan R. W. Aicher T. D. Carter L. L. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015 11 141 10.1038/nchembio.1714 25558972 · DOI

Authors
Zeng, X., Zhu, S., Lu, W., Liu, Z., Huang, J., Zhou, Y., Fang, J., Huang, Y., Guo, H., Li, L., Trapp, B. D., Nussinov, R., Eng, C., Loscalzo, J., & Cheng, F.
Affiliations
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology
  • East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • China Pharmaceutical University (CN)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Feixiong
Venue
Chemical Science
Published
2020
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
1775-1797
ISSN
  • 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-6539
OpenAlex
W2945027804
Cited by
357
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 29
FWCI
25.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (HHSN261200800001E)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R3509730)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HG007690, HL119145, HL61795, K99HL138272, R00HL138272)
  • American Heart Association (2017D007382)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
drug target identification, drug repurposing, heterogeneous networks, topotecan, RORγt, multiple sclerosis, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review