Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: state of the art and future challenges
Abstract
This review covers the sustainable development of advanced improvements in CO 2 capture and utilization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Separation of CO2 from N2 has been studied on activated and microporous carbons, graphene-based materials, MOFs, amine-functionalized adsorbents, metal oxides and carbonates, zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs.
“The separation of CO2 from N2 has been studied on different adsorbents, including activated and microporous carbons, graphene-based materials, MOFs, amine-functionalized adsorbents, metal oxides and carbonates, zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs,331−333,543,545−550”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [543]
Carbon capture by adsorption may be carried out by pressure-vacuum swing adsorption or temperature swing adsorption techniques.
“Carbon capture by adsorption may be carried out by pressure-vacuum swing adsorption or temperature swing adsorption techniques.527,543”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [543]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 597 · Cited by 1,388
- Authors
- Gao, W., Liang, S., Wang, R., Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Q., Xie, B., Toe, C. Y., Zhu, X., Wang, J., Huang, L., Gao, Y., Wang, Z., Jo, C., Wang, Q., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Louis, B., Scott, J., Roger, A.-C., Amal, R., He, H., & Park, S.-E.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Forestry University (CN)
- North China Electric Power University (CN)
- Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (CN)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Inha University (KR)
- ICPEES – Institut de Chimie et Procédés pour l'Énergie, l'Environnement et la Santé
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Qiang
- Park, Sang-Eon
- ORCID
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8584-8686
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W3093358822
- Cited by
- 1,388
- References
- 597
- Citations by year
- 2026: 227 · 2025: 282 · 2024: 312 · 2023: 232 · 2022: 232 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Society Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (Ecological Restoration Engineering)
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2019M1A2A6071804)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1810209)
- Central Universities in China (2019JQ03015)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Keywords
- carbon capture and utilization, industrial CO2 capture, CO2 utilization, CO2 sequestration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
