Cited by 372Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Drug–target affinity prediction using graph neural network and contact maps

Open access
Jiang, Mingjian, Li, Zhen, Zhang, Shugang, Wang, Shuang, Wang, Xiaofeng, Yuan, Qing, Wei, Zhiqiang·2020·RSC Advances

Abstract

Prediction of drug–target affinity by constructing both molecule and protein graphs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d0ra02297g

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial molecular profiling can measure gene expression at the cellular level and the location of cells in a tissue.

    “Spatial molecular profiling can measure both gene expression at the cellular level and location of cells in a tissue [160].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [160]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 372

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Salomon-Ferrer R. Case D. A. Walker R. C. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2013 3 198 210
  2. Bashir M. Y., Muneer K., Mustafa R. and Rehman H. U., in 2019 15th International Conference on Emerging Technologies, ICET, 2019, pp. 1–6
  3. Veličković P., Cucurull G., Casanova A., Romero A., Lio P. and Bengio Y., 2017, arXiv Prepr. arXiv:1710.10903 · arXiv
  4. Feng Q., Dueva E., Cherkasov A. and Ester M., 2018, arXiv Prepr. arXiv:1807.09741 · arXiv
  5. Nguyen T. Le H. Venkatesh S. bioRxiv 2019 684662
  6. Ronneberger O., Fischer P. and Brox T., in International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, 2015, pp. 234–241
  7. cheol J. J. Lin X. Chen X.-W. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 2010 8 2 308 315 20855926

Authors
Jiang, M., Li, Z., Zhang, S., Wang, S., Wang, X., Yuan, Q., & Wei, Z.
Affiliations
Ocean University of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Zhen
Venue
RSC Advances
Published
2020
Volume
10
Issue
35
Pages
20701-20712
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3032123378
Cited by
372
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 3
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RSC Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFD0900401)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
drug-target affinity prediction, graph neural networks, contact maps, protein contact prediction, protein structure prediction from sequence, molecular graphs, computer-aided drug design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review