Cited by 22Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesBiosensors and Analytical DetectionMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection

Magnetic-enhanced fluorescence sensing of tumor miRNA by combination of MNPs@PDA with duplex specific nuclease

Open access
Sun, Yujie, Wang, Cancan, Tang, Lina, Zhang, Yulin, Zhang, Guo-Jun·2021·RSC Advances

Abstract

A simple and sensitive fluorescence biosensor has been developed for detection of miRNA-141 by combining the magnetic nanoparticles coated with poly-dopamine (MNPs@PDA) with duplex specific nuclease (DSN).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d0ra09237a

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upon target-probe hybridization, increased probe rigidity leads to partial detachment from the PDA surface, resulting in fluorescence recovery.

    “Upon target–probe hybridization, increased probe rigidity leads to partial detachment from the PDA surface, resulting in fluorescence recovery.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Results and discussion section (Feasibility study of the method; page not provided) says target hybridization releases the DNA probe from MNPs@PDA and recovers fluorescence a little. The Introduction also says the resulting duplex has weak affinity for MNPs@PDA. Neither passage attributes the release to increased probe rigidity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The π-π absorption band of PDA extends into the near-infrared region, enabling formation of efficient quenching pairs with fluorescent dyes such as Cy5 and Alexa 647, with a Förster radius of approximately 3.2 nm.

    “In fluorescence-based sensing pathways, the π–π absorption band of PDA extends into the near-infrared region, enabling the formation of efficient quenching pairs with commonly used fluorescent dyes, such as Cy5 and Alexa 647, with a Förster radius of approximately 3.2 nm.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says PDA nanoparticles weaken fluorescence through an inner-filter effect, and the Feasibility study (page unavailable) reports a weak signal from FAM-labeled DNA bound to MNPs@PDA. The copy does not describe a near-infrared π–π absorption band, quenching pairs with Cy5 or Alexa 647, or a Förster radius of approximately 3.2 nm. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fluorescence recovery efficiency exhibits a linear correlation with target concentration over the range of 10 fM to 1 nM, with a correlation coefficient R2 exceeding 0.99.

    “Quantitative analysis demonstrates that the fluorescence recovery efficiency exhibits a linear correlation with target concentration over the range of 10 fM to 1 nM, with a correlation coefficient R2 exceeding 0.99.88”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Detection of miRNA section reports a linear relationship between fluorescence signal and target concentration with R² values of 0.9906 and 0.9933. It does not support the claimed 10 fM to 1 nM range: the reported ranges are 10 pM to 5 nM without magnetic separation and 5 pM to 5 nM with it. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In vitro tumor cell studies and selected animal tumor models support NIR-mediated photothermal therapy, drug loading, controlled release, and chemo-photothermal synergistic effects for PDA-based oral tumor therapy.

    “In vitro tumor cell studies and selected animal tumor models support NIR-mediated photothermal therapy, drug loading, controlled release, and chemo-photothermal synergistic effects.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) report miRNA detection in human cells and describe MNPs@PDA only as promising candidates for controlled targeted drug delivery. Searches for NIR photothermal therapy, drug loading, controlled release, and animal tumor models found no passage reporting the claimed therapeutic studies or effects. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Mo F. Wu J. Chen M. Meng H. Han Q. Fu Y. Sens. Actuators, B 2019 289 269 276 10.1016/j.snb.2019.03.044 · DOI
  2. Zhang H. Fu C. Wu S. Shen Y. Zhou C. Neng J. Yi Y. Jin Y. Zhu Y. Anal. Methods 2019 11 783 793 10.1039/C8AY02423E · DOI
  3. Shi C.-X. Li S.-X. Chen Z.-P. Liu Q. Yu R.-Q. Anal. Chem. 2018 91 2120 2127 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04583 30585725 · DOI
  4. Wei K. Zhao J. Qin Y. Li S. Huang Y. Zhao S. Talanta 2018 189 437 441 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.07.037 30086943 · DOI
  5. Yue S. Zhao T. Bi S. Zhang Z. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017 98 234 239 10.1016/j.bios.2017.06.060 28688309 · DOI
  6. Nie W. Wang Q. Yang X. Zhang H. Li Z. Gao L. Zheng Y. Liu X. Wang K. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017 993 55 62 10.1016/j.aca.2017.09.015 29078955 · DOI
  7. Zhang Y. Tang L. Yang F. Sun Z. Zhang G.-J. Microchim. Acta 2015 182 1535 1541 10.1007/s00604-015-1482-z · DOI
  8. Wang S. Zhang Y. Ning Y. Zhang G.-J. Analyst 2015 140 434 439 10.1039/C4AN01738B 25426801 · DOI
  9. Xiao L. Xu L. Gao C. Zhang Y. Yao Q. Zhang G.-J. Sensors 2016 16 1561 10.3390/s16101561 PMC5087350 27669248 · DOI
  10. Guo S. Yang F. Zhang Y. Ning Y. Yao Q. Zhang G.-J. Anal. Methods 2014 6 3598 3603 10.1039/C4AY00345D · DOI
  11. Liu Z. Luo D. Ren F. Ran F. Chen W. Zhang B. Wang C. Chen H. Wei J. Chen Q. RSC Adv. 2019 9 11960 11967 10.1039/C9RA01352K PMC9063470 35517011 · DOI
  12. Zhang Y. Sun Z. Tang L. Zhang H. Zhang G.-J. Microchim. Acta 2016 183 2791 2797 10.1007/s00604-016-1923-3 · DOI
  13. Jin D. Yang F. Zhang Y. Liu L. Zhou Y. Wang F. Zhang G.-J. Anal. Chem. 2018 90 14402 14411 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03959 30350954 · DOI
  14. Meng Y. Liu P. Zhou W. Ding J. Liu J. ACS Nano 2018 12 9070 9080 10.1021/acsnano.8b03019 30130385 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Zhang F. Wang S. Zou R. Xiang L. Cai C. Talanta 2019 202 342 348 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.05.036 31171193 · DOI
  16. Li X. Huang N. Zhang L. Zhao J. Zhao S. Talanta 2019 202 297 302 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.05.006 31171185 · DOI
  17. Yu W. Li J. Zuo C. Tao Y. Bai S. Li J. Zhang Z. Xie G. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019 1068 96 103 10.1016/j.aca.2019.04.016 31072482 · DOI
  18. Yang R. Jin J. Chen Y. Shao N. Kang H. Xiao Z. Tang Z. Wu Y. Zhu Z. Tan W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008 130 8351 8358 10.1021/ja800604z 18528999 · DOI
  19. Li H. Zhang Y. Wang L. Tian J. Sun X. Chem. Commun. 2011 47 961 963 10.1039/C0CC04326E 21079843 · DOI
  20. Miao X.-M. Ling L.-S. Shuai X.-T. Anal. Biochem. 2012 421 582 586 10.1016/j.ab.2011.11.031 22197417 · DOI
  21. Lin X. Zhang C. Huang Y. Zhu Z. Chen X. Yang C. J. Chem. Commun. 2013 49 7243 7245 10.1039/C3CC43224F 23842896 · DOI
  22. Mateescu B. Batista L. Cardon M. Gruosso T. De Feraudy Y. Mariani O. Nicolas A. Meyniel J.-P. Cottu P. Sastre-Garau X. Nat. Med. 2011 17 1627 1635 10.1038/nm.2512 22101765 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Wang S. Fu B. Wang J. Long Y. Zhang X. Peng S. Guo P. Tian T. Zhou X. Anal. Chem. 2014 86 2925 2930 10.1021/ac402535a 24564683 · DOI
  24. Tian T. Xiao H. Zhang Z. Long Y. Peng S. Wang S. Zhou X. Liu S. Zhou X. Chem.–Eur. J. 2013 19 92 95 10.1002/chem.201203344 23225082 · DOI
  25. Li Y. Zhang J. Zhao J. Zhao L. Cheng Y. Li Z. Analyst 2016 141 1071 1076 10.1039/C5AN02312B 26688865 · DOI
  26. Wang Q. Yin B.-C. Ye B.-C. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016 80 366 372 10.1016/j.bios.2016.02.005 26866561 · DOI
  27. Xie Y. Lin X. Huang Y. Pan R. Zhu Z. Zhou L. Yang C. J. Chem. Commun. 2015 51 2156 2158 10.1039/C4CC08912J 25554948 · DOI
  28. Lichner Z. Fendler A. Saleh C. Nasser A. N. Boles D. Al-Haddad S. Kupchak P. Dharsee M. Nuin P. S. Evans K. R. Jung K. Stephan C. Fleshner N. E. Yousef G. M. Clin. Chem. 2013 59 1595 1603 10.1373/clinchem.2013.205450 23958847 · DOI
  29. Tong A. W. Fulgham P. Jay C. Chen P. Khalil I. Liu S. Senzer N. Eklund A. C. Han J. Nemunaitis J. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009 16 206 216 10.1038/cgt.2008.77 18949015 · DOI
  30. Wach S. Nolte E. Szczyrba J. Stöhr R. Hartmann A. Ørntoft T. Dyrskjøt L. Eltze E. Wieland W. Keck B. Ekici A. B. Grässer F. Wullich B. Int. J. Cancer 2012 130 611 621 10.1002/ijc.26064 21400514 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, Y., Wang, C., Tang, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, G.-J.
Affiliations
  • Hubei University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • School of Laboratory Medicine
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yulin
Venue
RSC Advances
Published
2021
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
2968-2975
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121070752
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RSC Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21974035)
  • Hubei Provincial Department of Education (Q20162007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
Keywords
magnetic nanoparticles, polydopamine, duplex-specific nuclease, label-free detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review