Cited by 144Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsBone Metabolism and DiseasesDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

Inflammation and biomaterials: role of the immune response in bone regeneration by inorganic scaffolds

Sadowska, Joanna M., Ginebra, Maria-Pau·2020·Journal of Materials Chemistry B

Abstract

The regulatory role of the immune system in maintaining bone homeostasis and restoring its functionality, when disturbed due to trauma or injury, has become evident in recent years. The polarization of macrophages, one of the main constituents of the immune system, into the pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory phenotype has great repercussions for cellular crosstalk and the subsequent processes needed for proper bone regeneration such as angiogenesis and osteogenesis. In certain scenarios, the damaged osseous tissue requires the placement of synthetic bone grafts to facilitate the healing process. Inorganic biomaterials such as bioceramics or bioactive glasses are the most widely used due to their resemblance to the mineral phase of bone and superior osteogenic properties. The immune response of the host to the inorganic biomaterial, which is of an exogenous nature, might determine its fate, leading either to active bone regeneration or its failure. Therefore, various strategies have been employed, like the modification of structural/chemical features or the incorporation of bioactive molecules, to tune the interplay with the immune cells. Understanding how these particular modifications impact the polarization of macrophages and further osteogenic and osteoclastogenic events is of great interest in view of designing a new generation of osteoimmunomodulatory materials that support the regeneration of osseous tissue during all stages of bone healing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d0tb01379j

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 283 · Cited by 144

Authors
Sadowska, J. M., & Ginebra, M.-P.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (ES)
Corresponding author
Ginebra, Maria-Pau
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
Published
2020
Volume
8
Issue
41
Pages
9404-9427
ISSN
  • 2050-750X (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7518
OpenAlex
W3080115286
Cited by
144
References
283
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Departament d'Innovació, Universitats i Empresa, Generalitat de Catalunya (2017SGR1165, ICREA Academia)
  • Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (MAT2015-65601-R)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
bone regeneration, macrophage polarization, osteoimmunomodulation, bioceramics, bioactive glass, bone grafting, bone formation, angiogenesis, osteoclastogenesis, bone homeostasis, biomaterial surface modification
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Bone and Bones, Bone Regeneration, Humans, Immunity, Immunologic Factors, Inflammation, Macrophage Activation, Osteogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review