Cited by 10

Process Integrated Biosensors for Real‐Time Monitoring of Antibodies for Automated Affinity Purification

Tran, Thuy, Martinsson, Erik, Gustavsson, Robert, Tronarp, Otto, Nilsson, Mats, Hansson, Kristoffer Rudenholm, Lundström, Ingemar, Mandenius, Carl-Fredrik +1 more·2022·Analytical Methods

Abstract

A sensor technology for in-line detection of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in affinity capture steps is demonstrated. Continuous mAb monitoring during multiple consecutive purification cycles can facilitate automatization and continuous processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d2ay01567f

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LSPR biosensors have been utilized for in-line monitoring of the Protein A capture step, enabling high-sensitivity detection of column breakthrough by measuring product concentrations as low as 2 μg/mL in the effluent.

    “LSPR biosensors have been utilized for in‐line monitoring of the Protein A capture step, enabling the high‐sensitivity detection of column breakthrough by measuring product concentrations as low as 2 µg/mL in the effluent, allowing for early identification of column leakage [96].”
  • LSPR biosensing detects biomolecular interactions by monitoring shifts in the LSPR band.

    “LSPR biosensing detects biomolecular interactions by monitoring shifts in this band.”
  • LSPR biosensors are less sensitive to changes in temperature, sample composition and vibrations, and unlike spectroscopic techniques, they do not require advanced data analysis to extract product concentrations.

    “LSPR biosensors are less sensitive to changes in temperature, sample composition and vibrations, and unlike spectroscopic techniques, they do not require advanced data analysis to extract product concentrations [96].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. F. C. Breedveld, Lancet, 2000, 355, 735-740.
  2. R.-M. Lu, Y.-C. Hwang, I. J. Liu, C.-C. Lee, H.-Z. Tsai, H.-J. Li and H.-C. Wu, J. Biomed. Sci., 2020, 27, 1.
  3. A. Matte, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2022, 23, 8663.
  4. S. Hober, K. Nord and M. Linhult, J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 2007, 848, 40-47.
  5. A. A. Shukla, B. Hubbard, T. Tressel, S. Guhan and D. Low, J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 2007, 848, 28- 39.
  6. S. Kanje, J. Scheffel, J. Nilvebrant and S. Hober, in Approaches to the Purication, Analysis and Characterization of Antibody-Based Therapeutics, ed. A. Matte, Elsevier, 2020, ch. 2, pp. 35-54.
  7. G. R. Bolton and K. K. Mehta, Biotechnol. Prog., 2016, 32, 1193-1202.
  8. A. M. Ramos-de-la-Peña, J. González-Valdez and O. Aguilar, J. Sep. Sci., 2019, 42, 1816-1827.
  9. P. Gronemeyer, R. Ditz and J. Strube, Bioengineering, 2014, 1, 188-212.
  10. C. Murphy, T. Devine and R. O'Kennedy, Antib. Technol. J., 2016, 6, 17-32.
  11. D. Baur, M. Angarita, T. Müller-Späth, F. Steinebach and M. Morbidelli, Biotechnol. J., 2016, 11, 920-931.
  12. D. Baur, J. M. Angelo, S. Chollangi, X. Xu, T. Müller-Späth, N. Zhang, S. Ghose, Z. J. Li and M. Morbidelli, J. Biotech., 2018, 285, 64-73.
  13. J. Guo, M. Jin and D. Kanani, Biotechnol. J., 2020, 15, 2000192.
  14. F. Steinebach, N. Ulmer, M. Wolf, L. Decker, V. Schneider, R. Wälchli, D. Karst, J. Souquet and M. Morbidelli, Biotechnol. Prog., 2017, 33, 1303-1313.
  15. R. Godawat, K. Konstantinov, M. Rohani and V. Warikoo, J. Biotechnol., 2015, 213, 13-19.
  16. R. E. Mushens, A. R. Guest and M. L. Scott, J. Immunol. Methods, 1993, 162, 77-83.
  17. J. Horak, A. Ronacher and W. Lindner, J. Chromatogr. A, 2010, 1217, 5092-5102.
  18. L. Paradina Fernandez, L. Calvo and L. Vina, Int. Scholarly Res. Not., 2014, 2014, 487101.
  19. J. Zhang, S. Siva, R. Caple, S. Ghose and R. Gronke, Biotechnol. Prog., 2017, 33, 708-715.
  20. F. Feidl, M. F. Luna, M. Podobnik, S. Vogg, J. Angelo, K. Potter, E. Wiggin, X. Xu, S. Ghose, Z. J. Li, M. Morbidelli and A. Butté, J. Chromatogr. A, 2020, 1625, 461261.
  21. R. Godawat, K. Brower, S. Jain, K. Konstantinov, F. Riske and V. Warikoo, Biotechnol. J., 2012, 7, 1496-1508.
  22. R. A. Chmielowski, L. Mathiasson, H. Blom, D. Go, H. Ehring, H. Khan, H. Li, C. Cutler, K. Lacki, N. Tugcu and D. Roush, J. Chromatogr. A, 2017, 1526, 58-69.
  23. T. Tran, O. Eskilson, F. Mayer, R. Gustavsson, R. Selegård, I. Lundström, C.-F. Mandenius, E. Martinsson and D. Aili, Processes, 2020, 8, 1302.
  24. M. Kisovec, G. Anderluh, M. Podobnik and S. Caserman, Anal. Biochem., 2020, 608, 113899.
  25. G. Thakur, V. Hebbi and A. S. Rathore, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2020, 117, 673-686.
  26. E. Müller and J. Vajda, J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 2016, 1021, 159-168. 29 Cytiva, Affinity Chromatography vol. 1, Antibodies, https:// cdn.cytivalifesciences.com/api/public/content/digi-11660- pdf, accessed 20/09/2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tran, T., Martinsson, E., Gustavsson, R., Tronarp, O., Nilsson, M., Hansson, K. R., Lundström, I., Mandenius, C.-F., & Aili, D.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Molecular Materials, Division of Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden
  • ArgusEye AB, Spannmålsgatan 55, Linköping 583 36, Sweden
  • Biotechnology, Division of Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden
  • Wolfram MathCore AB, Teknikringen 1E, Linköping 583 30, Sweden
  • BioInvent International AB, Ideon Science Park, Lund 223 70, Sweden
  • Sensor and Actuator Systems, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden
Venue
Analytical Methods
Published
2022
Volume
14
Issue
44
Pages
4555-4562
ISSN
  • 1759-9660
  • 1759-9679
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (841373)
  • VINNOVA (2016-04120, 2019-00130)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review