Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward practical lithium-ion battery recycling: adding value, tackling circularity and recycling-oriented design

Mao, Jianfeng, Ye, Chao, Zhang, Shilin, Xie, Fangxi, Zeng, Rong, Davey, Kenneth, Guo, Zaiping, Qiao, Shizhang·2022·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

Recent progress in battery recycling is critically reviewed, including closed-loop design of new batteries and recycling-oriented design of battery configurations and components, together with an appraisal of predicted future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d2ee00162d

Cites

205 of 205 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–205 of 205

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Mao, J., Ye, C., Zhang, S., Xie, F., Zeng, R., Davey, K., Guo, Z., & Qiao, S.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2022
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
2732-2752
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W4285216876
Cited by
365
References
205
FWCI
27.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.