The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle
Abstract
The equations which govern the ion distributions and velocities, the electrostatic potential and the hydrodynamic flow field around a solid colloidal particle in an applied electric field are reexamined. By using the linearity of the equations which determine the electrophoretic mobility, we show that for a colloidal particle of any shape the mobility is independent of the dielectric properties of the particle and the electrostatic boundary conditions on the particle surface. The mobility depends only on the particle size and shape, the properties of the electrolyte solution in which it is suspended, and the charge inside, or electrostatic potential on, the hydrodynamic shear plane in the absence of an applied field or any macroscopic motion.New expressions for the forces acting in the particle are derived and a novel substitution is developed which leads to a significant decoupling of the governing equations. These analytic developments allow for the construction of a rapid, robust numerical scheme for the solution of the governing equations which we have applied to the case of a spherical colloidal particle in a general electrolyte solution. We describe a computer program for the conversion of mobility measurements to zeta potential for a spherical colloidal particle which is far more flexible than the Wiersema graphs which have traditionally been used for the interpretation of mobility data. Furthermore it is free of the high zeta potential convergence difficulties which limited Wiersema's calculations to moderate values of ζ. Some sample computations in typical 1:1 and 2:1 electrolytes are exhibited which illustrate the existence of a maximum in the mobility at high zeta potentials. The physical explanation of this effect is given. The importance of the mobility maximum in testing the validity of the governing equations of electrophoresis and its implications for the colloid chemist's picture of the Stern layer are briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Bazant, M. Z., Kilic, M. S., Storey, B. D., & Ajdari, A. (2009) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2009.10.001 · Cited by 916
Charging of Oil−Water Interfaces Due to Spontaneous Adsorption of Hydroxyl Ions
Marinova, K. G., Alargova, R. G., Denkov, N. D., Velev, O. D., Petsev, D. N., Ivanov, I. B., & Borwankar, R. P. (1996) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la950928i · Cited by 836
Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science
Dukhin, A. S., & Goetz, P. J. (2017) · Characterization of Liquids, Dispersions, Emulsions, and Porous Materials Using Ultrasound · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63908-0.00002-8 · Cited by 561
Guidance to improve the scientific value of zeta-potential measurements in nanoEHS
Lowry, G. V., Hill, R. J., Harper, S., Rawle, A. F., Hendren, C. O., Klaessig, F., Nobbmann, U., Sayre, P., & Rumble, J. (2016) · Environmental Science: Nano · doi:10.1039/c6en00136j · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, R. W., & White, L. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 1607
- ISSN
- 0300-9238 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039866490
- Cited by
- 1,746
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/f29787401607
- The paper
- O'Brien, R. W., & White, L. R. (1978). Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2. https://doi.org/10.1039/f29787401607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.